4

The Hubble parameter is thought to become constant and to attain a value of about 60 km/s per parsec. So every second a parsec of space grows with 60km. Is this consistent with an accelerated expansion of space? Wiki says it's a common misconception but that confuses me.

Say that a parsec of space grows with a parsec per second. Then after a second there are 2 parsecs. Then after two seconds there 4 parsecs. Four gives 8, etc. Is this what is meant with accelerated expansion? Or is this a constant expansion? If I look at a distant mass at rest wrt comoving coordinates, it seems to move away at increasing speed. But the Hubble parameter is constant.

About 5 billion years ago the universe started to accelerate. Does that mean the Hubble constant was smaller then? I know it was huge during inflation. Then it decreased suddenly and a slower expansion took over. But now expansion appears to be accelerating again.

I just don't see why this implies a constant Hubble parameter in the future of 60km/s per parsec.

Felicia
  • 1
  • 1
  • 10
  • 1
    Hi Frekkie, do the plots in this answer answer your question (especially plot #2)? – pela Sep 19 '22 at 10:35
  • @pela I think so, yes. Thank you! The second graph shows what I mean, I think. Doe it say the Hubble parameter grows? Or is that aH? Is the unit of H km/h per parsec? – Felicia Sep 19 '22 at 11:37
  • @pela Does an accelerated expansion mean that instead of, say, 1,2,4,8,16, etc, it goes like say, 1,2, 6, 11, 20, etc.? – Felicia Sep 19 '22 at 11:39
  • The second plot shows not H but a×H, which from H's definition is the same as da/dt. In other words it shows how much (the "da" part) the Universe expands in a given time (the "dt" part). You see that 1) it is always positive, meaning that the Universe has always expanded, 2) it first decreases, meaning that the expansion happened slower and slower, although the Universe still did expand, and 3) at some point it started increasing, meaning that expansion sped up again. – pela Sep 19 '22 at 12:00
  • So, as long as the curve in plot #2 is positive, we have expansion. "Accelerated expansion" just means any way you can imagine the the curve rises. One particular example of accelerated expansion is exponentially increasing expansion ("1, 2, 4, 8, 16, …"). And yes, the units of H is "speed per distance", though usually that distance is given not in parsec, but in mega-parsec (Mpc). Currently, H = H₀ ~ 70 km/s/Mpc, meaning that a galaxy 1 Mpc recedes at 70 km/s. – pela Sep 19 '22 at 12:07
  • @pela So 1,2,4,8,16,... has constant Hubble parameter an is an accelerated expansion? What, in the second graph, grows then? – Felicia Sep 19 '22 at 12:42
  • @pela If the universal expansion accelerates due to dark energy, will H become constant? I mean, doesn't that mean that the number of km's per Mpar grows? – Felicia Sep 19 '22 at 12:51
  • H tells you how fast a galaxy at a given distance recedes. A constant H of 56 km/s/Mpc means that a galaxy at 1 Mpc recedes at 56 km/s. If you then wait 10B years, and measure the recession velocity of a galaxy at 1 Mpc, you'll find the same speed. But those galaxy cannot be the same galaxy, because galaxy #1 has moved farther away. If, say, it has moved to a distance of 2 Mpc, it will now recede at 112 km/s, 10B years later at 224 km/s, and so on. – pela Sep 19 '22 at 14:11

1 Answers1

1

Accelerating expansion means that the separation between two points in the universe increases at an increasing rate.

The Hubble parameter is the constant of proportionality between the rate of change of separation and the separation. Clearly, if the Hubble parameter is constant, but the separation is increasing with time, then the rate of change of that separation must also be increasing with time. i.e. an acceleration. $$ \frac{da}{dt} = a(t) H(t)$$

The Hubble parameter is currently decreasing and was larger in the past. The sign of the acceleration changed because the expansion rate is proportional to the Hubble parameter multiplied by the separation between two points, and the latter was smaller in the past.

The maths and plots are shown in Pela's answer to a similar question. https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/a/25986/2531

ProfRob
  • 151,483
  • 9
  • 359
  • 566
  • So the change, 5 billion years ago, from a decelerated expansion to an accelerated expansion has nothing to do with H getting higher but instead with aH getting higher? In other words, even if you ad a fixed number of km per Mpar the space expansion accelerates because the space gets bigger? – Felicia Sep 19 '22 at 13:47
  • 1
    And so 1,2,4,8,16 is an accelerated expansion? – Felicia Sep 19 '22 at 13:54
  • 1
    @Felicia it is an exponentially accelerating expansion. – ProfRob Sep 19 '22 at 14:32