tl;dr: the only "unknown" order is 3072.
In the small groups library (available in the computer algebra systems GAP and Magma), many of the groups of order in the range from 2049 to 4095 are already available. Indeed, all but 216 of them. Here is a check in GAP that counts how many orders are missing
gap> Length(Filtered([2049..4095], n -> not SmallGroupsAvailable(n)));
216
The relatively new GAP package SotGrps by Eileen Pan (as far as I know equivalent code is also in Magma) adds support for more infinite families of groups, but in this case, that just takes care of 2 of the "missing" orders.
However, using e.g. the GrpConst package by Besche and Eick (with some minor optimizations by myself) plus enough patience and waiting time one can construct the groups of many of the missing orders. We did so as part of our paper
Eick, Bettina; Horn, Max; Hulpke, Alexander, Constructing groups of ‘small’ order: recent results and open problems, Böckle, Gebhard (ed.) et al., Algorithmic and experimental methods in algebra, geometry, and number theory. Cham: Springer (ISBN 978-3-319-70565-1/hbk; 978-3-319-70566-8/ebook). 199-211 (2017). ZBL1400.20014.
Now, this leaves some "hard" orders. In the end, just two are left, 2304 and 3072.
For the order $2304=2^8\cdot 3^2$, we were able to deal with it with a new algorithms presented in
Eick, Bettina; Horn, Max, The construction of finite solvable groups revisited, J. Algebra 408 (2014), 166–182, also available on the arXiv.
This only leaves order $3072=2^{10}\cdot 3$, which is currently out of reach. To resolve it, we'd first have to actually compute all the groups of order 1024; we know how many there are up to isomorphism ($49\,487\,367\,289$) and in principle have the tools to compute them, it's a matter of patience (CPU time, and perhaps RAM size etc.). But then you need to perform computations for each of these groups to get the "descendants" of order 3072. That would be a massive computations -- it might just be feasible if you have a big enough compute cluster and lots of time and write some improved code, but frankly, I am not sure it'd be worth the effort. That said, others might think the same about order 2304, so ....
You can browse a lot of the data we produced in our papers at https://groups.quendi.de.