I'm trying to make a pattern that's easy to preceive by human but hard to write out by Mathematica when I came across this problem. (Check the original problem here)
Let's check this simple case:
I've got a list {5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,4,3,3,3,3,3,3,10} and I would like to find out all the recurrence period and the sequence before and after them. So, if you have a brief match with your brain, you can know there are two possible matchs:{5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,4,3,3,3,3,3,3,10} and {5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,4,3,3,3,3,3,3,10}.
It's okay if I only want to find out one of them, using the following code will work as desired:
Replace[{5, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 10},
{Shortest[pre___, 3], Longest[Repeated[Shortest[rep__, 1], {2, Infinity}]], Shortest[inc___, 2]}
:> {{pre}, {rep}, {inc}}]
(*{{5}, {1, 2}, {4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 10}}*)
But If I want to find out all of them, it's not quite direct as the following code which simply change Replace to ReplaceList will not work:
r1=
ReplaceList[{5, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 10},
{Shortest[pre___, 3], Longest[Repeated[Shortest[rep__, 1], {2, Infinity}]], Shortest[inc___, 2]}
:> {{pre}, {rep}, {inc}}]
The result is incredibly long and included all the possible match and ignored all the Shortest or Longest:
r2 = ReplaceList[{5, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 10},
{pre___, Repeated[rep__, {2, Infinity}], inc___} :> {{pre}, {rep}, {inc}}]
Sort@r1==Sort@r2
(*True*)
This is, of course, not the desired result, but how can I set the pattern-matcher to do this work? And are there any reason that ReplaceList will ignore all these Shortest and Longest? Any help or any other approach other than my way is appreciated. But of course, the final goal is to solve this using ReplaceList or similar functions.
LongestandShortestas some sort of selection criteria instead of the specification of search order...... So, may I additionally ask how to make things go like my original intention? I mean: use normal pattern matching style method to create a result like my additional information or Edmund's answer. So I mean are there any convenient way to add another level of selection afterReplaceList. – Wjx Aug 01 '16 at 06:03LongestandShortestONLY change the search ORDER, not FILTER search RESULT . will be quite clear~ – Wjx Aug 01 '16 at 06:07ToExpressionis not good, at least from my first thought...... Am I correct this time? Are there any examples where String approach will still be more effective even withToExpressioninside? – Wjx Aug 01 '16 at 06:57