22

I know that there are methods to structurally manipulate held expressions (discussed e.g. here), but I failed to apply those for this particular problem:

(Hold[{3, 4, 5 | 6}] /. (Verbatim@Alternatives)[x__] :> RandomChoice@List@x)
Hold[{3, 4, RandomChoice[{5, 6}]}]

The code should replace any Alternatives in the held expression with an appropriate choice from the alternatives, in this case either 5 or 6, i.e. it should evaluate the replacement.

Alexey Popkov
  • 61,809
  • 7
  • 149
  • 368
István Zachar
  • 47,032
  • 20
  • 143
  • 291
  • @kguler but HoldFirst is not a "held expression" wrapper, it's an attribute. – FJRA Mar 07 '12 at 02:08
  • @FJRA, just realized why OP wanted to use Hold rather than HoldFirst or HoldRest or HoldAll (and deleted my previous comment before I saw your explanation) – kglr Mar 07 '12 at 02:14
  • @rm-rf & WReach, is there any particular reason why Verbatim is used in each answer? This will do too: /. x_Alternatives :> RuleCondition@RandomChoice@(List @@ x) or /. x_Alternatives :> With[{eval = RandomChoice@(List @@ x)}, eval /; True]). – Kuba Nov 22 '13 at 09:47
  • 1
    @Kuba Verbatim is only used becase I wanted to pass on arguments as Sequence[5, 6] instead of 5|6 as in a replacement, the latter could possibly match more than one thing. It's not necessary but I guess they all tried to comply with my original specification. Your's is equally good. – István Zachar Nov 22 '13 at 09:59
  • Ok, thanks, I just wasn't sure if I get everything :) – Kuba Nov 22 '13 at 10:07

2 Answers2

26

Here are a couple of alternatives to Trott-Strzebonski in @R.M's answer:

Hold[{3,4,5|6}] /.
  Verbatim[Alternatives][x__] :> RuleCondition@RandomChoice@List@x

Hold[{3, 4, 5}]

Hold[{3,4,5|6}] /.
  Verbatim[Alternatives][x__] :> Block[{}, RandomChoice@List@x /; True]

Hold[{3, 4, 6}]

They operate on the same principle as Trott-Strzebonski (i.e. RuleCondition), but express the effect in different ways.

WReach
  • 68,832
  • 4
  • 164
  • 269
23

This is a case where the Trott-Strzebonski in-place evaluation trick is useful. You use With to inject inside your held expression as:

(Hold[{3, 4, 5 | 6}] /. (Verbatim@Alternatives)[x__] :> 
    With[{eval = RandomChoice@List@x}, eval /; True])

Out[1]= Hold[{3, 4, 5}]

You should definitely read this post by Leonid, that gives you a good insight into how this works, but in short, using Condition or /; forces the evaluation of eval when the condition is True (i.e., always) and then injected arbitrarily deep using With.

rm -rf
  • 88,781
  • 21
  • 293
  • 472
  • Just a note the talk title is "Working with Unevaluated Expressions" in case the link to wolfram library changes again in the future. – xslittlegrass Jul 19 '15 at 16:24