60

What are the open big problems in algebraic geometry and vector bundles?

More specifically, I would like to know what are interesting problems related to moduli spaces of vector bundles over projective varieties/curves.

Stefan Kohl
  • 19,498
  • 21
  • 73
  • 136
Sun
  • 103
  • 11
    Why don't you read some of the literature on these topics to find out? Usually recent ICM talks, survey articles in the bulletin, and recently published advanced textbooks are good places to start for this kind of thing. – Emerton Aug 30 '10 at 15:31
  • 32
    This seems a perfectly good question. I would be interested to see some of the answers. – Richard Borcherds Aug 30 '10 at 15:52
  • 13
    MO questions like the rest of us need luck. This question was lucky enough that Richard Borcherds offered a very nice answer and potentially there will be further answers that we can enjoy and ultimately this will be a useful source. Let's keep it open! – Gil Kalai Aug 30 '10 at 16:59
  • 5
    We've had many discussions over at meta about whether a sufficient condition to be a good question is that it generates good answers. The overall consensus (that's too strong a word ... plurality opinion?) seems to be "no". If "too broad/vague" were a criterion on the list of reasons to close, I would vote to close. As of my comment, this question currently has four votes to close as "off topic", but it's certainly not that, it's just too vague. I do think it should be improved, though, and I will go in to fix capitalization. – Theo Johnson-Freyd Aug 30 '10 at 18:39
  • I agree that this question is a bit too broad. But otherwise I don't think it's a bad question. There's an analogous question that was posted at the CS theory SE site recently: http://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/174/major-unsolved-problems-in-theoretical-computer-science – Kevin H. Lin Aug 30 '10 at 21:34
  • 8
    Theo, this is not a correct characterization of the discussions on meta. This was an issue where there were different opinions. My opinion was that just like in "real world mathematics" (and science) attracting good answers is a merit of a question. The answers can give prople some clues for what to look for in the ICM talks and bulletin articles Mathew referred to. In fact, good answers can give useful links to specific such papers. In any case, I have voted to reopen. – Gil Kalai Aug 30 '10 at 21:39
  • 4
    Please discuss this question in this meta thread: http://tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/640/what-are-the-major-open-problems-in-/ – Kevin H. Lin Aug 30 '10 at 21:41
  • 4
    As a non-geometer, I am puzzled by the "...and vector bundles" part. I would look on this question more favourably if more information or indication had been given as to what level the questioner is at. Just as if someone at a social occasion asks "what do you do and why is it important", knowing their motives or background helps me decide between "abstract math" and "homological properties of semigroup and Fourier algebras" as an answer – Yemon Choi Aug 30 '10 at 21:48
  • 2
    Yemon -- there are plenty of problems involving algebraic vector bundles. E.g. it is not known whether or not every complex vector bundle on a complex projective space is algebraic (it is strongly suspected that the answer is no, but to the best of my knowledge this hasn't been proven). Some of these problems are not as well known as they should be. Voting to reopen. – algori Aug 30 '10 at 22:20
  • 4
    @algori - I guessed as much, but it seemed odd to name a broad area like "algebraic geometry" and then something more focused like "(algebraic) vector bundles". It would be very roughly like asking "what are the open problems in functional analysis and subnormal operators" – Yemon Choi Aug 30 '10 at 22:34
  • @Gil Kalai: I might have misremembered or misread the meta discussions, and I apologize if I have mischaracterized the conclusions of those discussions. (Indeed, I have the impression that those discussions are ongoing.) If I have further thoughts on this question, I will bring them up on the meta discussion that Kevin Lin created. As it is, I have no major contributions. – Theo Johnson-Freyd Aug 31 '10 at 02:57
  • Could Langlands be counted here, seeing as it uses an enormous amount of modern algebraic geometry, even though it seems to be more in number theory and representation theory? – David Corwin Aug 31 '10 at 04:32
  • Dear Theo, no need to apologize. we can have different readings of the meta threads. – Gil Kalai Aug 31 '10 at 05:36
  • 4
    Dear Davidac897, The algebro-geometric aspects of the Langlands program (at the current moment) primarily involve (a) studying the arithmetic geometry of Shimura varieties, and (b) as in Ngo's work, studying perverse sheaves on certain very special algebraic stacks. While both areas of investigation demand very sophisticated algebro-geometric tools, my view is that they are a somewhat specialized to be the answers to the general question of "what are big open problems in algebraic geometry", as opposed to "what are big open problems whose investigation may require algebraic geometry". – Emerton Aug 31 '10 at 12:04
  • I like this question because AG is notoriously vast, so a question like this can educate the populace on the current state of things. – Jon Bannon May 18 '12 at 19:59

11 Answers11

40

A few of the more obvious ones:

* Resolution of singularities in characteristic p
*Hodge conjecture
* Standard conjectures on algebraic cycles (though these are not so urgent since Deligne proved the Weil conjectures).
*Proving finite generation of the canonical ring for general type used to be open though I think it was recently solved; I'm not sure about the details.

For vector bundles, a longstanding open problem is the classification of vector bundles over projective spaces.

(Added later) A very old major problem is that of finding which moduli spaces of curves are unirational. It is classical that the moduli space is unirational for genus at most 10, and I think this has more recently been pushed to genus about 13. Mumford and Harris showed that it is of general type for genus at least 24. As far as I know most of the remaining cases are still open.

35

Let me mention a couple of problems related to vector bundles on projective spaces.

  1. The Hartshorne conjecture. In its weak form it says that any rank 2 vector bundle on $\mathbf{P}^n_{\mathbf{C}},n>6$ is a direct sum of line bundles, which implies that any codimension 2 smooth subvariety whose canonical class is a multiple of the hyperplane sectionis a complete intersection. In a stronger form Hartshorne's conjecture says that any codimension $>\frac{2}{3}n$ subvariety of $\mathbf{P}^n_{k},k$ an algebraically closed field is a complete intersection. See Hartshorne, Varieties of small codimension in a projective space, Bull AMS 80, 1974. The weak conjecture fails for $n=3$ and $4$ -- there are examples (due to Horrocks and Mumford) of non-split vector bundles of rank 2 on $\mathbf{P}^4_{\mathbf{C}}$, but so far as I know the question if any such examples exist for $n>4$ is open. See here Evidences on Hartshorne's conjecture? References? for a discussion including some references.

  2. The existence of non-algebraic topological vector bundles on $\mathbf{P}^n_{\mathbf{C}}$. It is a classical result that any topological complex vector bundle on $\mathbf{P}^n_{\mathbf{C}}, n\leq 3$ is algebraic, see e.g. Okonek, Schneider, Spindler, Vector bundles on complex projective spaces, chapter 1, \S 6. It is strongly suspected that for $n>3$ there are topological complex vector bundles that are not algebraic. Good candidates are nontrivial rank 2 vector bundles on $\mathbf{P}^n_{\mathbf{C}}, n\geq 5$ all of whose Chern classes vanish which were constructed by E. Rees, see MR0517518. It is claimed there that these bundles do not admit a holomorphic structure, but later a gap was found in the proof. See here Complex vector bundles that are not holomorphic for some more information.

algori
  • 23,231
35

The Jacobian conjecture

  • 4
    This problem is (in)famous. I've lost track of the number of false claims regarding this on the arxiv and elsewhere. – Donu Arapura Aug 31 '10 at 14:24
  • For a good introduction to the subject, allow me to recommend the book Polynomial automorphisms and the Jacobian conjecture, by Arnoldus Richardus and Petrus van den Essen. Given the simplistic statement, how little is truly understood of that problem is simply shocking, and the first pages of the book really helped me dispel many misconception. – Thierry Zell Aug 31 '10 at 16:13
19

Linearization Conjecture. Every algebraic action of $\mathbb{C}^*$ on $\mathbb{C}^n$ is linear in some coordinates of $\mathbb{C}^n$. Open for $n>3$.

Cancellation Conjecture. If $X\times \mathbb{C}\cong \mathbb{C}^{m+1}$ then $X\cong \mathbb{C}^m$. Open for $m>2$.

Coolidge-Nagata Conjecture. A rational cuspidal curve in $\mathbb{P}^2$ is rectifiable, i.e. there exists a birational automorphism of $\mathbb{P}^2$ which transforms the curve into a line.

Carlos
  • 161
  • 4
    I believe the Coolidge-Nagata conjecture is now known, see http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.07149 – dhy Feb 16 '16 at 22:25
  • Neena Gupta surveyed the cancellation conjecture, better known as Zariski’s Cancellation Problem, in 2015: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13226-015-0154-3 –  Sep 16 '21 at 14:33
17

There's also the big open question (I think it's still open) about whether rationally connected varieties are always unirational. I think people believe the answer is NO, but they don't know an example.

Joe Harris had some slides a few years ago with regards to this Seattle 2005

Karl Schwede
  • 20,257
14

We can also mention two other major open problems :

  • The abundance conjecture, stating that if a $K_X+\Delta$ is klt and nef, then it is semi-ample (a multiple has no base-point)

  • The Griffith's conjecture : if $E$ is an ample vector bundle over a compact complex manifold, then it is Griffith-positive. (this is known for line bundles of course)

Henri
  • 2,697
  • 1
    Henri, can you add links? – Gil Kalai Aug 30 '10 at 17:20
  • 1
    Well, Y.T Siu has recently claimed he had proved the abundance conjecture (in a version stating that the Kodaira dimension equals the numerical Kodaira dimension); here's the paper : arxiv.org/abs/0912.0576 – Henri Aug 30 '10 at 20:54
  • 1
    For some additional discussion of Siu's work, see the recent question http://mathoverflow.net/questions/31605/does-negative-kodaira-dimension-imply-uniruled – Karl Schwede Aug 31 '10 at 00:51
  • 1
    Griffiths conjecture is also known to be true for general vector bundles on curves! – diverietti Jan 11 '12 at 16:59
14

There's also Fujita's conjecture.

Conjecture: Suppose $X$ is a smooth projective dimensional complex algebraic variety with ample divisor $A$. Then

  1. $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_X(K_X + mA))$ is generated by global section when $m > \dim X$.
  2. $K_X + mA$ is very ample for $m > \dim X + 1$

It's also often stated in the complex analytic world.

Also there are many refinements (and generalizations) of this conjecture. For example, the assumption that $X$ is smooth is probably more than you need (something close to rational singularities should be ok). It also might even be true in characteristic $p > 0$.

It's known in relatively low dimensions (up to 5 in case 1. I think?)

Karl Schwede
  • 20,257
9

The Maximal Rank Conjecture is a major outstanding problem in Brill-Noether theory, although recent advances in tropical techniques might point the way to a solution; see https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05460.

EDIT: The Maximal Rank Conjecture was proved by Eric Larson in his PhD thesis; see: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04906

Sam Hopkins
  • 22,785
9

In connection to vector bundles over $\mathbb{P}^n$, Hartshorne's paper from 1979 provides a list of open problems. The paper is "Algebraic vector bundles on projective spaces: A problem list" Topology, 18:117–128, 1979.

I don't know which of those problems are still open, but I would be interested in knowing how much progress has been made on those problems, since 1979.

Mahdi Majidi-Zolbanin
  • 3,101
  • 1
  • 20
  • 29
  • 1
    One of them is atonishingly simple but still completely open : Let $E$ a rank $2$ vector bundle on $\mathbb{P}^n$, with $n \geq 7$. Then $E$ is split... – Libli Jan 19 '17 at 14:57
  • 1
    A question was asked about this here, with no answers (so far) but a few comments https://mathoverflow.net/questions/288955/hartshornes-conjectures-about-algebraic-bundles – j.c. Apr 15 '18 at 20:22
6

Motives and Algebraic cycles: A selection of conjectures and open questions, Joseph Ayoub.

Open problems in Algebraic Geometry, S.J. Edixhoven (editor), B.J.J. Moonen (editor), F. Oort (editor).

tttbase
  • 1,700
6

The Tate conjecture: Let $k$ be a finitely generated field, $X/k$ a smooth projective geometrically integral variety and $\ell$ invertible in $k$. Then the cycle class map $$\mathrm{CH}^r(X) \otimes_\mathbf{Z} \mathbf{Q}_\ell \to \mathrm{H}^{2r}(\bar{X},\mathbf{Q}_\ell(r))^{G_k}$$ is surjective.

It is e.g. proved for $r=1$ and Abelian varieties, a deep theorem. See http://www.math.harvard.edu/~chaoli/doc/TateConjecture.html.

This is analogous to the Hodge conjecture for complex varieties.