19

If we try to separate two quarks bound into a meson or a hadron, the energy in the gluon field eventually will be large enough to spawn a quark-antiquark pair.

How far can we stretch that gluon field before it "snaps"? What's the average distance? I can't seem to find it anywhere.

AccidentalFourierTransform
  • 53,248
  • 20
  • 131
  • 253
Calmarius
  • 8,100

2 Answers2

12

From lattice calculations (see String Tension of Quark-Anti-Quark Pairs in Lattice QCD) it has been found that the string tension of the quarks, in the case of pions, is given by $$ \sqrt{\sigma}\sim460\ \mathrm{MeV} $$ which is equivalent to a length of $\sim 2.7\ \mathrm{fermi}$.

In the case of the charmonium ($\bar c c$), the tension (see Charmonium potential from full lattice QCD) is close to $$ \sqrt{\sigma}\sim394\ \mathrm{MeV} $$ that is, a lenght of $3.1\ \mathrm{fermi}$.

For a bottomonium state ($\bar b b$), the best estimate I've found (see Bottomonium states versus recent experimental observations in the QCD-inspired potential model) is $$ \sqrt\sigma\sim 410\ \mathrm{MeV} $$ i.e., $3\ \mathrm{fermi}$.

AccidentalFourierTransform
  • 53,248
  • 20
  • 131
  • 253
  • This number is too large, see my answer here: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/238218/what-maximum-energy-can-be-stored-in-a-gluon-field-flux-tube/238223#238223 – Thomas May 27 '16 at 15:46
  • 1
    @Thomas Where did you get the $1\ \mathrm {GeV/fm}$ value? You can see in my links (which are more recent than yours) that the LQCD results are closer to $400\ \mathrm{MeV/fm}$... – AccidentalFourierTransform May 27 '16 at 15:50
  • (460 MeV)^2=1 GeV/fm – Thomas May 27 '16 at 15:52
  • @Thomas welp, according to wolfram alpha its more like $2.7\ \mathrm{fm}$. – AccidentalFourierTransform May 27 '16 at 15:54
  • (460 MeV)^2 = (460 MeV)/(200 MeVfm) = 460 MeV 2.3/fm = 1 GeV/fm – Thomas May 27 '16 at 16:01
  • @Thomas there is some weird algebra going on there :P (perhaps a square is missing?) anyway, I don't see how any of this is relevant to the question or my answer (and in any case, any possible result for this is kind of questions is an estimate, so it's perfectly reasonable for you and me to get two different results, mine twice as large as yours) – AccidentalFourierTransform May 27 '16 at 16:10
  • Since string breaking scale is known in GeV, we have to convert string tension from energy squared to energy/distance. No mystery here. 2) There is a weird error in woflram alpha. 460 MeV=2.3/fm not 2.7/fm, but this is indeed no big deal. 3) String breaking scale is not uncertain by a factor of three, it is uncertain by (10-15)%, see the arxive preprint I cite.
  • – Thomas May 27 '16 at 16:40
  • @Thomas 1) you wrote (460 MeV)^2 = (460 MeV)/(200 MeV$$fm) when you probably meant (460 MeV)^2 = (460 MeV)$\color{red}{{}^2}$/(200 MeV$$fm) (whatever, not important) 2) yep, weird huh?. 3) a "scale" is always uncertain by more than a $10-15%$, because it's a scale after all. Again, your paper disagrees with mine, so it's pointless for us to reference them: I too can say "see the preprint I cite", and wouldn't be any more correct/wrong than you... – AccidentalFourierTransform May 27 '16 at 16:46
  • Yes. 3) You cite a paper for the string tension (correct, of course); I show how to convert this to a string breaking distance (different number, but well determined), The paper I cite confirms that this is the right number, because they compute BOTH the string tension and the string breaking distance.
  • – Thomas May 27 '16 at 16:54
  • @Thomas Oh, now I see what you meant! sorry for that, I just misunderstood you. It thought you were saying that the string tension was off by a factor of two, not the breaking distance. I just converted the tension to distance, neglecting the mass/energy details, and that's why I said that the number was an estimate. But you're right that your calculation is more accurate (though I still think that any possible answer for this question is kind of uncertain by at least a factor of two, so to some extent the details can be neglected: we are talking QM here, so the "distance" is uncertain) – AccidentalFourierTransform May 27 '16 at 17:01
  • The QCD string has heavy quarks at its endpoints, so the string length is defined up to an uncertainty $1/m_b\sim 0.05$ fm. – Thomas May 27 '16 at 18:39