2

Im trying to develop a system that autonomously navigates a large outside space, where accuracy is vital (GPS is too inaccurate). There are a number of options but have largely been used inside, has anyone tried these or used anything else?

WiFi triangulation, Dead reckoning, RFID landmarks

Andrew
  • 560
  • 2
  • 10
  • 26
user1949366
  • 121
  • 1

3 Answers3

2

I would look at the System "PIKSI" from Swift Navigation

It uses one fixed GPS modul and one which is carried on your Robot. Your accuracy is about 5 centimeters, which is pretty good for a GPS based system

I haven't tried it yet, so I cannot share experience, but I think it is worth a try.

Here are some links:
http://swiftnav.com/piksi.html
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/swiftnav/piksi-the-rtk-gps-receiver

TobiasK
  • 1,657
  • 1
  • 9
  • 17
0

I have tried using Decawave's DW1000 chips. You can now get these on little boards:

DW1000 board

These can measure the distance between each other by measuring the time of flight of an Ultra-Wideband message. The precision is about 10cm, and the trueness depends on a lot of factors.

You have a few as base stations, and one or more on each robot. By triangulation, you can work out the location of the robot.

I can report that the chips are insanely complex to program, and the example code they provide is a huge hairball that looks like it was written by an intern. However, they do work, and the other benefit is that you can put a data payload in the messages, so they solve your communications problems too.

Rocketmagnet
  • 6,457
  • 5
  • 29
  • 54
0

You can fuse Laser mesurements (which are very precise) with GPS mesurements to navigate and localize the obstacles. I think this is the solution used by google car, but be careful: Laser finders can be very expensive.

Amine Horseman
  • 301
  • 1
  • 2
  • 7