Is there a preferred way to typeset an empty sqrt? What I'm doing now is \sqrt{\phantom{a}}, are there other/preferred ways like a standalone symbol? Or should I just create a new macro with the phantom a?
Asked
Active
Viewed 1.0k times
21
Brent.Longborough
- 27,991
Andreas Hettel
- 659
1 Answers
32
The \surd command just produces the radical symbol √ as opposed to \sqrt{stuff} which typesets the square root of stuff with a bar over stuff. The Chicago Manual of Style uses just the radical symbol in the text "The radical sign √ is used to denote the square root".
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
Compare:
\begin{itemize}
\item The radical sign $\surd$ is used to denote the square root.
\item The radical sign $\sqrt{}$ is used to denote the square root.
\item The radical sign $\sqrt{\phantom{x}}$ is used to denote the square root.
\end{itemize}
Alternatively: the square root of $x$ is denoted $\surd x$ or $\sqrt{x}$.
\end{document}

The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics also just uses the radical sign (without an over bar) when defining both the terms "radical" and "square root".
Nicola Talbot
- 41,153
-
7Notice that
\surdplaces the symbol a bit higher, hence producing more pleasant vertically centered output. – yo' Dec 15 '13 at 17:51 -
Let me add that the bar used in root notation historically was used as parentheses, before parentheses were introduced. So it is correct to write √(2 + 2) = 2. – Alexey Jul 24 '22 at 17:18
\surdunless you specifically need the top bar. – Nicola Talbot Dec 15 '13 at 13:27\surdWhen the sqrt is introduced in mathematical textbooks, how is the empty symbol printed? Is it ok to print it without the top bar? – Andreas Hettel Dec 15 '13 at 13:30The radical sign $\surd$ is used to denote the square root. – Nicola Talbot Dec 15 '13 at 13:47