What's the difference between \strut, \mathstrut and \vphantom? When would I prefer one of them to the others, and why?
- 12,311
2 Answers
Each are defined as follows in the default document classes (article, book and report):
\strut
\def\strut{\relax\ifmmode\copy\strutbox\else\unhcopy\strutbox\fi}
with \strutbox defined as
\setbox\strutbox\hbox{%
\vrule\@height.7\baselineskip
\@depth.3\baselineskip
\@width\z@}%
\mathstrut
\def\mathstrut{\vphantom(}
Using \mathstrut would be equivalent to using \vphantom(, with \strut sets a zero-width rule (\@width\z@) with depth .3\baselineskip (\@depth.3\baselineskip) and height .7\baselineskip (\@height.7\baselineskip). Note that the latter is font-dependent, since it uses \baselineskip. That is, it is modified with font change selections using \fontsize{..}{..}\selectfont, including the use font switches like \small, \large, etc.
I would use \strut within text or math, and use \vphantom if there is anything else I want a specific height of without the horizontal displacement. For example, when breaking two lines of math with different heights but still wanting to use extensible delimiters \left and \right. \mathstrut is specific to the size of ( and (quoting barbarabeeton), "\mathstrut is often better in math than \strut. Which one is better depends on the local context."
Loading the amsmath redefines these boxes somewhat, although their interpretation remains the same.
-
3You should note that
\strutis updated by every font size changing command (\large,\smalland so on). What you say about "font dependency" is not very clear, IMO. – egreg Jan 15 '12 at 21:56 -
@Werner --
\mathstrutis often better in math than\strut. which one is better depends on the local context. – barbara beeton Jan 15 '12 at 22:16 -
-
2And it is worth mentioning that the height of boxes in
\fbox{\strut g}\fbox{\strut \"A}are not equal because\strutdoes not automatically detect the highest and deepest characters in the active character set. – kiss my armpit Mar 31 '13 at 03:12 -
Why is it meaningful/interesting to specify the "depth" of the vrule? – einpoklum Jun 12 '15 at 08:35
-
@einpoklum: The
\strutshould cover the anticipated height of ascenders (like those in k, l, t, ...) but also the depth of descenders (like those in g, j, p, q, ...). – Werner Jun 12 '15 at 16:00 -
-
May I ask if
\mathstrutshould give different results to{}? For example, I don't see differences betweenA^i\mathstrut_jandA^i{}_j– vagoberto Nov 16 '16 at 15:16 -
The \strut and \mathstrut commands just define a box with a zero width and a convenient fixed height and depth. The last command is for math mode.
The \vphantom commands lets you create a box with a zero width and the same depth and height as the material that's in the argument of the command. The \vphantom command is ideal for scaling left and right delimiters, as is explained in the following example, which is from LaTeX and Friends. The example requires amsmath. The other commands aren't as flexible.
\begin{align*}
f & = g\left( 3^{3^{3}} + \text{\textrm{\ldots}}\right.\\
& \qquad \left.+ 3\vphantom{3^{3^{3}}} \right)\,.
\end{align*}
- 757,742
\vphantomtakes some content and produces the same vertical size, while\strutalways inserts a font-size specific but otherwise fixed amount. – Martin Scharrer Jan 15 '12 at 21:33