In my ongoing quest to destroy biblatex-chicago in response to editorial command--definitely going to look into building from a more flexible style for my future projects, if custom in-house publisher styles are going to be common--I need to rearrange two elements of @incollection entries.
Based on the MWE given below, the standard output in a footnote for such an entry is:
F. Lastname, “Longer Article Title,” in Collected Essays, ed. I. Editor (City, 1918), 207–225.
and the bibliography is
Lastname, F. “Longer Article Title.” In Collected Essays, edited by I. Editor, 207–225. City, 1918.
There are two elements which I need rearranged (and correspondingly reformatted): 1) the editor needs to go before the title of the collection 2) the pages should go at the end in the bibliography like they do in the footnote.
The target footnote would therefore be:
F. Lastname, “Longer Article Title,” in I. Editor, ed., Collected Essays (City, 1918), 207–225.
and the bibliography would be
Lastname, F. “Longer Article Title.” In I. Editor, ed., Collected Essays. City, 1918, 207–225.
MWE:
\documentclass[12pt]{memoir}
\usepackage[notes,shorthandibid,backend=biber,addendum=false,sorting=nyt,giveninits=true,useprefix=false,shorthandfull]{biblatex-chicago}
\usepackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents*}{jobname.bib}
@incollection{lastname18,
author = {Lastname, Firstname},
title = {Longer Article Title},
shorttitle = {Longer},
pages = {207--225},
booktitle = {Collected Essays},
editor = {Important Editor},
date = {1918},
address = {City},
}
\end{filecontents*}
\addbibresource{jobname.bib}
\begin{document}
Text.\autocite{lastname18}
\printbibliography
\end{document}

biblatex-chicagoare not for the faint-hearted... – moewe Jun 11 '19 at 07:27incollectionchanged?) Or should the changes be made for other entry types? If the former, then you could make very specific changes easily enough. The risk of broader changes is that there are unintended consequences withbiblatex-chicago. – David Purton Jun 11 '19 at 10:21