When using numeric style the \citet{key} command outputs Lastname [n]. I'd like this to output Lastname F. [n] where F is a Firstname initial.
p.s.
Here is MWE code
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont[
BoldFont={DeJavu Serif Bold},
ItalicFont={DeJavu Serif Italic},
BoldItalicFont={DeJavu Serif BoldItalic}
]{DeJavu Serif}
\usepackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents*}{\jobname.bib}
@article{baez/article,
author = {Baez, John C. and Lauda, Aaron D.},
title = {Higher-Dimensional Algebra {V}: 2-Groups},
journaltitle = {Theory and Applications of Categories},
date = 2004,
volume = 12,
pages = {423-491},
version = 3,
eprint = {math/0307200v3},
eprinttype = {arxiv},
langid = {english},
langidopts = {variant=american},
annotation = {An \texttt{article} with \texttt{eprint} and
\texttt{eprinttype} fields. Note that the arXiv reference is
transformed into a clickable link if \texttt{hyperref} support
has been enabled. Compare \texttt{baez\slash online}, which
is the same item given as an \texttt{online} entry},
hyphenation={english},
}
@article{another,
author = {Another,Author and One more, Author},
title = {Title},
journaltitle = {Journal},
date = 2004,
volume = 12,
pages = {423-491},
version = 3,
eprint = {math/0307200v3},
eprinttype = {arxiv},
langid = {english},
langidopts = {variant=american},
hyphenation={english},
}
\end{filecontents*}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[natbib=true,
style=numeric,
isbn=true,
url=true,
defernumbers=false,
sorting=nyt,
firstinits=true,
backend=biber,
language=auto,
autolang=other]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}
\begin{document}
\citet{another} \\
Some text \\
\citet{baez/article} \\
\nocite{*}
\printbibliography
\end{document}
I'd like to have Baez,J.C. and Lauda,A.D. [2] italic shape is preferable :)
p.s.
It was noted to me in comments,that correct way to cite is J.C. Baez and A.D. Lauda [2] , but question remains :how to output name initials in numeric citation style
\citetcommand is designed for use in text. Normally - at least in English - it would not make sense to sayAs Smith J. [18] proved in 1954.... If you used an initial you'd wantAs J. Smith [18] proved in 1954.... Do you want this for use with another language where the conventions are different? – cfr Sep 19 '15 at 20:27uniquenameoption. – moewe Mar 24 '17 at 13:30