When I use the booklet package alone, it works just fine and produces the output I expect. However, when I combine it with the geometry package, it produces really bad output.
Here's my MWE. First, I comment out the geometry package:
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
%%\usepackage[landscape]{geometry}
\usepackage[print]{booklet}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\setpdftargetpages
\begin{document}
\lipsum[1]
\newpage
\lipsum[2]
\newpage
\lipsum[2]
\end{document}
which gives me the following output. Notice the results are in portrait format - I want landscape:

Here are results from the same file with the geometry line uncommented. The orientation is in landscape format, but the margins are all wrong. Notice how the text clips on the first page and overlaps on the second:

How can I make the geometry package work with the booklet package? I am using TeXLive 2012, by the way.
p.s. My apologies for the unscaled images.


landscape, the original or the booklet? If you readbookletmanual (with commandtexdoc bookletor here) you will findlandscapeoption for landscape documents. Why do you needgeometry? – Ignasi Aug 08 '12 at 07:59geometryfor. – Justin Bailey Aug 08 '12 at 16:05geometryandbooklet, but as an alternative solution you could forgetbookletand usegeometryto produce your main document and after that, usepdfpagesto construct your booklet version. Look at: booklet-with-a-specific-page-order-rule, booklets-in-memoir-class – Ignasi Aug 09 '12 at 10:24pgfpagesinstead ofbooklet. Look at La Raison answer in foldable-booklet-like-toodledos-one-pocketmod – Ignasi Aug 09 '12 at 10:27pdfpageshas an optionsignature=...where you say how many pages you want to fold. Please, look at the manual, everything is explained in it. – Ignasi Aug 10 '12 at 17:17