When studying systems of linear equations, it's nice to remind people that the last column of the coefficient matrix holds the constants. This is often done in books by putting a vertical line between the last column and the next to last column. What is a good way to do this in LaTex?
10 Answers
If you build your own environment using array, you're on the safe side. I would extend an internal macro of amsmath using an optional argument.
Advantages:
It extends several matrix environments at the same time (
matrix,pmatrix,bmatrix,Bmatrix,vmatrix,Vmatrix).The names and meanings of those environments remain (not
apmatrixetc.)Spacing etc. is the same like in
amsmath.You could do more than just insert a vertical line (use color and alignment, for instance right aligned columns because of minus signs).
If you omit the optional argument, it acts exactly like the
amsmathenvironment.
Caution:
- Since you redefine an internal macro, it might not work if the original package changes its code. But
amsmath.styhas not been changed for more than 10 years. If there's a change in the matrices later, you could adjust your own macro.
Code:
Here's the redefinition, just put it in your preamble after loading amsmath:
\makeatletter
\renewcommand*\env@matrix[1][*\c@MaxMatrixCols c]{%
\hskip -\arraycolsep
\let\@ifnextchar\new@ifnextchar
\array{#1}}
\makeatother
I had to use \makeatletter ... \makeatother because of the @ in macro names.
The optional argument is the standard amsmath argument to \array. The original definition in amsmath is:
\def\env@matrix{\hskip -\arraycolsep
\let\@ifnextchar\new@ifnextchar
\array{*\c@MaxMatrixCols c}}
So, there's not much that's been changed.
Examples:
Simple augmented matrix:
\begin{pmatrix}[cc|c]
1 & 2 & 3\\
4 & 5 & 9
\end{pmatrix}
More complex use, with different alignment, spacing and color:
\begin{bmatrix}[*2cr@{\quad}|@{\quad}>{\color{red}}r]
a & b & 1 & 4 \\
c & d & -2 & -3
\end{bmatrix}
Output:

Just remove the optional argument in brackets and you will get the standard pmatrix or bmatrix.
I've used this code and examples in a blog post in 2008: An extension to amsmath matrix environments.
If you don't wish to redefine that internal macro, you could give it a different name and build your amatrix environment on it exactly the same way that amsmath does with pmatrix.
- 603,163
- 231,401
One way to do this is implemented in the (free, in both senses!) online linear algebra textbook Linear Algebra by Jim Hefferon. It's written in LaTeX and is open-source so one can download the book and its attendant style files. One of them, called linalgjh.sty is about typesetting common linear algebra stuff such as augmented matrices and row reductions and the like. The code for the augmented matrices is:
\newenvironment{amatrix}[1]{%
\left(\begin{array}{@{}*{#1}{c}|c@{}}
}{%
\end{array}\right)
}
and is used as:
\begin{amatrix}{2}
1 & 2 & 3 \\ a & b & c
\end{amatrix}
(note that the argument is one less than the total number of columns). I guess that the @{}s at the start and end are to get the spacing right with the parentheses (mentioned by TH in a comment to fabikw's similar answer).
That style file has several other useful linear algebra macros that may be useful.
- 103
- 153,724
- 43
- 389
- 751
-
2This example doesn't work for me. pdflatex says
Missing $ inserted.– Stand with Gaza Mar 12 '17 at 14:27 -
8For latex newbies (like me): You have to put the example inside
\[and\]latex codes. – Stand with Gaza Mar 12 '17 at 14:40 -
1I wanted to make it so the argument matched the total number of columns. A solution from my question here: https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/571599/37581 showed that replacing {#1} with {\numexpr#1-1} does exactly what I wanted. I thought it would be helpful to others using this solution so thought I'd mention it here. – Abe Schulte Nov 20 '20 at 12:21
-
If you are using an array to input the matrix, you just have to specify something like
\left(\begin{array}{cc|c}
2 & 0 & 1\\
0 & 1 & 1
\end{array}\right)
- 6,203
-
3That's not a good way to do it. The spacing is wrong between the parentheses and the matrix. – TH. Aug 24 '10 at 04:42
-
-
4As Andrew Stacey points out, @{} is all that's needed to fix up the spacing. That was eluding me. – TH. Aug 24 '10 at 07:27
-
2I like that this answer does not require any unusual packages or difficult to understand hacks. – shuhalo Jan 19 '20 at 23:39
If you would rather not override styles, you can create an augmented matrix using standard matrix commands like so:
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 &\bigm| & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 &\bigm| & 5 \\
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 &\bigm| & -4 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 &\bigm| & -2
\end{pmatrix}
generating the following.
- 319
If for some reason (e.g. you try to make augmented matrix in Pages) other answers do not work, you can make an augmented matrix with two matrices inside delimiters of your choice:
\left[
\begin{matrix}
1 & 2 & 3 \\
1 & 2 & 3 \\
1 & 2 & 3 \\
1 & 2 & 3 \\
\end{matrix}
\left|
\,
\begin{matrix}
4 \\
4 \\
4 \\
4 \\
\end{matrix}
\right.
\right]
This code produces a matrix like this:

You can modify space between delimiters by adding \, or other spacers.
- 301
The easybmat package provides a way to add all sorts of lines between cells in a matrix, including dashed lines which I seem to recall being popular in my undergraduate linear algebra text.
Edit: Here's an example. I'm actually not thrilled about the spacing.
\[\left(\begin{BMAT}(@){cc.c}{cc}
a_{11} & a_{12} & b_1\\
a_{21} & a_{22} & b_2
\end{BMAT}\right)\]
- 158,329
- 62,639
-
The spacing between entries are adjusted using the optional argument of BMAT environment. For example, using \begin{BMAT}[10pt] gives a much bigger matrix. – AgentSmith Sep 03 '20 at 02:18
The package nicematrix provides tools to draw mathematical matrices. There is no environment for augmented matrices in this package but it's easy to create one (compatible with the other features of nicematrix: dotted lines, blocks, exterior rows and columns, etc.).
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{nicematrix}
\usepackage{tikz}
\makeatletter
\ExplSyntaxOn
\NewDocumentEnvironment { pNiceMatrixAug } { }
{ \begin { pNiceMatrix } }
{
\CodeAfter \tikz \draw (1-|\arabic{jCol}) -- (last-|\arabic{jCol}) ;
\end { pNiceMatrix }
}
\ExplSyntaxOff
\makeatother
\begin{document}
$\begin{pNiceMatrixAug}
a_{11} & a_{12} & \Cdots & a_{1n} & 0 \
a_{21} & a_{22} & \Cdots & a_{2n} & 0 \
\Vdots & & & \Vdots & \Vdots \
a_{n1} & a_{n2} & \Cdots & a_{nn} & 0 \
\end{pNiceMatrixAug}$
\end{document}
However, you need several compilations.
EDIT: In order to have the ability to use \CodeBefore (and \Body) and \CodeAfter as in all the environment of nicematrix, and a color of the vertical rule which respects the key rules\color (and \arrayrulecolor), we must write an environment {pNiceMatrixAux} a bit more complicated:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{nicematrix}
\usepackage{tikz}
\makeatletter
\ExplSyntaxOn
\NewDocumentEnvironment { pNiceMatrixAug } { }
{ \pNiceMatrix }
{
\tl_gput_right:Nn \g_nicematrix_code_after_tl
{
\group_begin:
\CT@arc@ % for the color of the rule
\tikz \draw (1-|\arabic{jCol}) -- (last-|\arabic{jCol}) ;
\group_end:
}
\endpNiceMatrix
}
\ExplSyntaxOff
\makeatother
\begin{document}
$\begin{pNiceMatrixAug}[rules/color=blue,left-margin]
\CodeBefore
\cellcolor{red!15}{1-1,2-2,4-4}
\Body
a_{11} & a_{12} & \Cdots & a_{1n} & 0 \
a_{21} & a_{22} & \Cdots & a_{2n} & 0 \
\Vdots & \Vdots & & \Vdots & \Vdots \
a_{n1} & a_{n2} & \Cdots & a_{nn} & 0 \
\CodeAfter
\line{2-2}{4-4}
\end{pNiceMatrixAug}$
\end{document}
- 40,250
I would do something like this:
{
\centering
$$
\left(
\begin{array}{ccc|c}
1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\
8 & 4 & 2 & 1 \\
64 & 16 & 4 & 1 \\
\end{array}
\right)
$$
}
- 708
-
2What's
\centeringdoing? Also,$$is best avoided in LaTeX; prefer\[..\]. – egreg Sep 03 '13 at 13:59 -
-
4In math mode there is no alignment it's centered by default. See also http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/503/why-is-preferable-to . – percusse Sep 03 '13 at 19:36
-
Indeed. But last time I used this, I could not have the matrix centered without using the
\centeringcommand. Very strange. – qed Sep 04 '13 at 13:52
A simple and clean solution for an augmented matrix can be obtained with the tabularray package.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tabularray}
\NewDocumentEnvironment{Abmatrix}{+b}{
\left[
\begin{tblr}{rowsep = {1pt}, colsep = {5pt}, column{1} = {leftsep = 0pt}, column{Z} = {rightsep = 0pt}, cells = {c}, vline{Y} = {dashed, 0.75pt}}
#1
\end{tblr}
\right]
}{}
\begin{document}
An augmented bmatrix:
[
\begin{Abmatrix}
2 & -1 & 2 & 9 \
1 & -2 & 4 & 12 \
3 & 1 & -1 & 2
\end{Abmatrix}
]
And another one:
[
\begin{Abmatrix}
3 & 5 & 7 & 8 & 3 \
6 & -2 & -3 & 12 & 5
\end{Abmatrix}
]
\end{document}
- 188
\left[\begin{array}{cccc|c}
1 & 0 & 1 & -1 & 0 \\
-1 & 1 & -2 & -1 & 0 \\
1 & -2 & 3 & 2 & 0
\end{array}\right]
- 65,388




mathtools.sty, but it's not like that matters much when you have full-featured array options available for all your matrix commands – kahen Nov 06 '11 at 02:27\begin{matrix} <newline> [s] & [t] <newline> \end{matrix}will (despite the newline) interpret the[s]as the optional parameter. It's possible to wrap[s]in braces, or add\relaxbefore[s]to fix the issue ____________________________________________________________________________________________ For documentation of@ifnextchar, see https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/4790 andnew@ifnextcharsee https://ctan.math.washington.edu/tex-archive/macros/latex/required/amsmath/amsgen.pdf – user202729 Oct 20 '21 at 14:04[*\c@MaxMatrixCols c]with[*\c@MaxMatrixCols r]in the above declaration. Go figure. – Gigi Bayte 2 Jan 21 '22 at 02:47