After reading that the warning, Package biblatex Warning: Patching footnotes failed. is generated due to a redefinition of \@footnotetext by beamer I tried to retain its definition with the following patch. However, after compiling the document I noticed all my citations in the footnotes were gone. I use \footcitetext together with \footnotemark to have references in the footnotes.
\makeatletter
\let\predefinedfootnotetext\@footnotetext
\makeatother
\documentclass[10pt, xcolor = {dvipsnames}, presentation]{beamer} % xcolor is already loaded with beamer
\makeatletter
\let\@footnotetext\predefinedfootnotetext
\makeatother
Beamer patching footnotes warning: "Patching footnotes failed. Footnote detection will not work."
Such as the above most of the answers on this site suggest using the silence package, yet I wonder how to remedy this issue correctly. Some suggest editing the sty files, but it seems to be a daunting task.
What is the scope of this problem, when are you bound to run into trouble?
verbose-type styles or make a distinction between footnote and in-text citation and use other intricate features does it become relevant. In most other cases it can be safely ignored (or silenced). – moewe May 12 '17 at 08:46biblatexdevelopers include this in thebiblatexcode. – moewe May 12 '17 at 13:31beamer's footnote though. I could almost get it running, but then patching fails because of an incorrect category code regime inbeamer. – moewe May 12 '17 at 14:01bidiis that you also need to deal with howhyperrefinteracts with footnotes. And you would probably need to take care of interactions withbiditoo to did things properly. – David Purton May 12 '17 at 22:33biblatexbug tracker for this (https://github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/581). So if there is a solution here that can be implemented inbiblatex, that would be great. – moewe Oct 29 '17 at 15:19