When subscript in the expression \int\limits_{some stuff} is large, it seems that LaTeX underestimates the space occupied by the subscript which leads to the wrong placement of e.g. \left\lvert (vertical line touches the subscript, with no spacing in between). The issue is absent when \sum is used instead of \int, and the spacing on the left side looks good in this case. Similarly, using underbrace on \int\limits_{some stuff} creates a bracket shifted by around a millimeter to the right which again looks weird. As before, everything works well for \sum instead of \int\limits. Why is it so and how can the behavior of \int\limits be fixed?
MWE:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
[\left\lvert\int\limits_{0000000}\right\rvert]
[\underbrace{\int\limits_{0000000}}]
[\left\lvert\sum_{0000000}\right\rvert]
[\left\lvert\sum\limits_{0000000}\right\rvert] %\limits doesn't impact \sum behavior as expected
[\underbrace{\sum_{0000000}}]
\end{document}



\lvertand\rvertaccordingly? If no nice and automatic solution is possible, I could perhaps manually introduce some\hspace', but I've never seen the unitu#` and LaTeX seems not to recognize it. How can I convert it to pt or em? – Tomasz23 Jan 22 '22 at 22:04