6

Is the ultimate reason that the neutron star loses angular momentum that the magnetic-dipole radiation is not spherically symmetric and photons have momentum?

Just for the loss of angular momentum, particles emitted from the neutron star surface are not necessary, right?

ProfRob
  • 151,483
  • 9
  • 359
  • 566
questionhang
  • 3,137
  • 1
  • 20
  • 31
  • I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because you haven't made the connection to astronomy clear. Better on Physics. – James K Dec 22 '16 at 19:26

1 Answers1

9

Radiation carries a momentum per unit volume given by $$ \vec{p} = \epsilon_0 \vec{E} \times \vec{B}$$

It therefore carries an angular momentum of $$ \vec{L} = \vec{r}\times \vec{p} = \epsilon_0 \vec{r} \times (\vec{E}\times \vec{B})$$

For plane-polarised transverse electromagnetic waves propagating in the $\hat{r}$ direction, then $\vec{L}=0$. However, if the axis of a magnetic dipole is inclined to the rotation axis then the radiation is not a single pure transverse wave; the dipole moment is the sum of two oscillating magnetic dipole moments that are perpendicular and oscillate $\pi/2$ out of phase. These produce two transverse waves, with arbitrary amplitudes, perpendicular polarisations and a $\pi/2$ phase shift between them - a.k.a. elliptically polarised light. Elliptically polarised light carries angular momentum.

ProfRob
  • 151,483
  • 9
  • 359
  • 566