19

I know that airplanes use rudder to turn, and use elevator for nose up and down.

How do helicopters change their altitude and how do they make turns?

Farhan
  • 29,390
  • 14
  • 112
  • 183
  • Related question - http://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/2036/what-are-forward-flight-straight-flight-level-flight-and-cruise-flight-in-a-h?rq=1 – Simon Jan 14 '15 at 16:47
  • Are you asking about the physics of turning or how the controls are used to turn? – copper.hat Jan 14 '15 at 20:11

6 Answers6

30

Airplanes do not use their rudder to turn; they do it by banking into the direction of the desired turn, then the wings "lift" the plane in that direction. The rudder is only used to maintain lateral trim, so that the airflow doesn't impinge on the side of the fuselage and drag is minimized. To initiate a turn, the pilot uses the stick or yoke to actuate the ailerons on the wingtips, causing the wing on the inside radius of the turn to go down and the wing on the outside radius of the turn to go up. A slight back-pressure of the stick or yoke raises the nose, causing a "climb" to be initiated, but since the plane is banked toward the center of a circle, the "climb" doesn't cause a change in altitude, instead it causes the plane to fly a circular path. Small, simultaneous changes in engine power and rudder deflection are needed in order to maintain proper trim and constant altitude in what is called a "coordinated turn".

Helicopters turn in a manner analogous to that of an airplane. In forward flight, the cyclic stick (between the pilot's legs) is pushed slightly in the direction of the desired turn, causing the rotor disc to tilt, just as the wings of an airplane are tilted in a banked turn. The collective lever and throttle (at the pilot's left side) are adjusted as needed to maintain altitude and the rudder pedals are adjusted to maintain a coordinated turn. Since the fuselage of a helicopter is suspended from the rotor hub like a pendulum, as the helicopter enters the turn, the fuselage tends to be flung outward, so it banks, just like the fuselage of the airplane that is rigidly connected to its wings. (In a hover, with no forward airspeed, a helicopter can turn in any direction with the rudder pedals alone, something an airplane cannot do. In this special case the fuselage remains level.)

To change altitude, it is necessary to add power to climb or reduce power to descend. This is true of any heavier-than-air aircraft, as, for a constant velocity, increasing altitude implies increasing potential energy and decreasing altitude implies reducing potential energy. In helicopters in forward flight, a climb is accomplished by first pulling back slightly on the cyclic stick to raise the nose and establish a climb attitude, then raising the collective lever and twisting the throttle grip on the collective lever to maintain constant rotor speed. As the collective is raised, the pitch of the main rotor blades increases, giving them more "bite" on the air and, therefore, more lift. A skilled helicopter pilot will perform these actions in a coordinated manner, such that everything appears to happen simultaneously. In the special case of a hover, a helicopter can climb and descend with the rotor disk in a constant horizontal attitude. As described above, the collective lever is raised and power is increased with the throttle to put more energy into the system, raising the aircraft; to descend the collective lever is lowered and power is decreased with the throttle. Directional control in a hover is maintained entirely with the pedals; if the helicopter is the most common type with an anti-torque tail rotor, moving the rudder pedals requires the throttle to be increased or decreased slightly to compensate for the varying power consumed by the tail rotor and to maintain constant altitude.

(If this sounds complicated to you, you're right. Rotary wing flight is considerably more difficult than fixed wing flight, and it took decades longer to perfect helicopters after fixed wing aircraft had taken to the skies.)

Andrew P.
  • 409
  • 3
  • 4
  • 2
    There is one thing I'd love to see expanded a bit here, and yes I realize the FAA gets it wrong. That is: the rotor disk does not just tilt because you moved the stick - I would like to see an explanation of cyclic pitch and precession added here. – Jasmine Jan 15 '15 at 01:27
  • Indeed, the rotor does not tilt, the whole helicopter does. The cyclic simply changes lift differently on different sides of the rotor by varying blade pitch depending on their current position. – Jan Hudec Jan 15 '15 at 08:00
  • 3
    @JanHudec "the rotor does not tilt" - it most certainly does. The rotor tilts first. followed a short while later by the fuselage which acts like a pendulum and "follows" the disc. – Simon Jan 15 '15 at 08:46
  • @JanHudec Let me give you a concrete example. On sloping ground, the disc should be level with the horizontal before lifting. This is achieved by tilting the disc, quite significantly sometimes, then lifting. The disc will stay horizontal and once clear of the ground, the fuselage will swing level underneath it. It feels very strange the first time you do a lift from a significant slope. – Simon Jan 15 '15 at 08:55
  • 4
    @Simon: Nevertheless the rotor hub does not have any tilting hinge. The cyclic does not tilt anything, it changes blade pitch differently by position. The blades flap accordingly, so the result is that the disk tilts, but it's not the rotor as a whole, it is the blades flapping individually. (So saying the rotor tilts is not really wrong, but it is misleading as to how it works) – Jan Hudec Jan 15 '15 at 08:58
  • 2
    Ah, cross purposes :) We are both saying the same thing. It's the distinction between the "rotor" and the "disc". – Simon Jan 15 '15 at 12:43
  • 1
    Although the blades flap through differential lift, saying the rotor doesn't tilt puts you at odds with every pilot, every CFI, and the FAA's way of talking about it. It's like saying "the engine doesn't drive the wheels on a 4wd car. The engine drives. Each wheel individually," which may be true but misses the point. – rbp Jan 15 '15 at 12:53
  • Helicopters don't have rudder pedals – rbp Jan 15 '15 at 12:55
  • @rbp But the pedals controlling the tail rotor blade pitch have the same effect as the rudder pedals in winged airplaines: the push (or pull) the tail to the left, or right, so the direction of the whole thing changes. – TheBlastOne Jan 15 '15 at 13:04
  • Then why not call the cyclical the steering wheel? – rbp Jan 15 '15 at 13:16
  • There is no steering wheel. There are two controls controlling the same thing: Collective (controlling main blade pitches in an all-at-once manner), and cyclic (controlling the main blades' pitches depending on their position on the rotor circle). Collective is one control (one handle that can be moved in one direction, ie. forward and backward), and cyclic is the second (the main "joystick", two dimensions, forward/backward and left/right). No wheel in sight. – TheBlastOne Jan 15 '15 at 13:42
  • 1
    I think rbp is aiming at the misnomer of "rudder" pedals for... what's the correct word for the pedals in a heli? – DevSolar Jan 15 '15 at 13:43
  • 1
    The collective is two controls. And unlike an airplane in which the stick is two one-axis controls, the cyclic is one two-axis control. There are plenty of airplanes that have steering wheels http://www.conniesurvivors.com/pictures/N494TW-27Feb99-Cockpit.jpg . the pedals in a helicopter are properly called anti-torque pedals and control yaw. they are not rudder pedals or tail-wheel pedals, and they don't necessarily control anything on the tail (http://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/8642/how-can-a-helicopter-be-designed-without-a-tail-rotor/8643#8643) – rbp Jan 15 '15 at 14:06
  • 1
    @TheBlastOne the anti-torque pedals don't have the same effect as the rudder in an airplane, as you would find out in MCA in an airplane, or in a helicopter with LTE – rbp Jan 15 '15 at 14:12
  • Airplanes can and do use the rudder to turn. Granted, most of the time they do not but while doing some radio testing we wanted to keep the antenna pointing towards the ground so we did flat turns up to 8 hours a day for several weeks. Talk about a left leg workout! – CramerTV Jan 16 '15 at 02:12
  • @rbp, to avoid the nomenclature issue, some texts just call them "pedals". Since the rotor systems on coaxial or tandem rotor craft inherently cancel torque, to generally call them anti-torque pedals would be incorrect. I called them "rudder pedals" in this discussion for the purpose of illustration, likening them to the rudder of a ship, which controls yaw. I have yet to encounter a text that calls them "yaw pedals", though. – Andrew P. Nov 05 '15 at 14:46
  • even coaxial rotors don't completely cancel torque, and the pilot still needs to yaw the aircraft with the pedals to keep the nose pointing where she wants. – rbp Nov 05 '15 at 15:21
  • @AndrewP. Hey, i see you mentioning the pedals being used for turning or turn stabilization depending on flight mode, and then adjusting the throttle for changes in tail rotor power, but i don't see any mention of the pedals' method of action being changing the pitch/power/whatever of the tail rotor or related device. – Weaver Mar 15 '18 at 20:39
  • @StarWeaver — If I understand your question correctly, on a helicopter with main rotor and anti-torque tail rotor, varying pitch of the tail rotor blades with the pedals to get more or less 'bite" on the air and yaw the craft requires more or less engine power, respectively. To keep constant altitude in hovering turns requires making coordinated throttle adjustments by twisting the grip on the collective lever, depending on direction of the turn. The pedals have no mechanical link to the throttle. The effect is less evident when main rotor is in translational lift, as when in forward flight. – Andrew P. Mar 15 '18 at 22:25
11

A helicopter has 3 separate flight regimes: normal flight, autorotation, and hovering.

In normal flight and in an autorotation, a helicopter pilot initiates a turn by applying left or right pressure on the cyclic, the control stick between the pilots legs. Through a series of control rods or actuators, the cyclic causes the swash plate to change the pitch of the blades of the rotor, depending on the position of the blade in its cycle.

To turn the heli, more lift is needed on the outside of the turn than on the inside. Taking into consideration gyroscopic precession, the swashplate adjusts the blades so that the blade pitch is highest on the outside of the turn and lowest on the inside of the turn, which causes the rotor disc as a system to tilt to initiate the turn. In a semi-rigid rotor system, the entire disc actually tilts on the teetering hinge

enter image description here

In a fully-articulating rotor system (via the flapping hinge) or on a rigid rotor system (flexible blades), only the individual blades move, although they all move in concert to generate the effect of the entire disk tilting.

enter image description here

Once the disk starts to tilt horizontally in the direction of the cyclic, the fuselage will follow it along, and the heli rolls into the turn. Once the desired bank angle is established, the cyclic can be neutralized, and the increased airflow over the rotary wing on the outside of the turn will maintain the aircraft in the turn.

Since all the controls on a helicopter are strongly-coupled, the pilot will need to adjust the pitch, yaw, and power in order to control the heli's altitude, fuselage heading, and airspeed, and to correct for ambient conditions such as wind and turbulence.

In hovering flight, the helicopter pilot turns the helicopter by use of the anti-torque pedals, which control the yaw axis of the aircraft. And indeed, one can "turn" a helicopter during a flight without initiating it with horizontal movement of the cyclic. To do this, slow the aircraft to a hover, yaw the aircraft to the desired heading, and re-initiate forward motion. Don't try this in your airplane!

rbp
  • 16,734
  • 4
  • 60
  • 104
5

There are three controls in a helicopter:

  • Cyclic stick (this cyclically changes the pitch of the blades, creating different amounts of lift at different points of the cycle)
  • Collective lever (this determines the force generated by the rotor)
  • The anti-torque pedals (they control the tail-rotor)

This picture shows the result of moving the cyclic. As you can see, the whole rotor is turned, causing the helicopter to move in a certain direction, as shown in this image by AVstop Helicopter handbook

The collective determines the amount force generated by the main rotor

The anti-torque rotor is used to rotate the helicopter, as shown here, obtained from Gunschip Academy: enter image description here

The main rotor will induce a torque on the cabin, making it spin. A force is needed to prevent this spinning. The tail-rotor provides this force, keeping the helicopter-cabin straight. However, if we want the cabin to rotate, we can adjust the blade pitch of the tail-rotor. This will change the force delivered by the tail-rotor. The imbalance in moments will then rotate the cabin.

It should be noted here, that all the movements are strongly coupled. Any input will always have additional side-effects, which need to be counteracted.

ROIMaison
  • 7,157
  • 2
  • 37
  • 78
  • 1
    “Cyclic stick (this changes the disk plane of the main rotors).” No, it does not. It changes blade pitch differently depending on their position. – Jan Hudec Jan 15 '15 at 08:56
  • You're right, I'll change my answer. – ROIMaison Jan 15 '15 at 09:15
  • That change made your answer the best one. – TheBlastOne Jan 15 '15 at 13:05
  • 1
    The only thing I am missing in the answer is a statement about the fact that usually, the tail rotor is spinning at constant speed, and the force created by it is controlled by that blade pitch change. Also, the aspect that to keep the heading constant, the tail rotor must generate a "base" force to counteract the torque that is generated by spinning the main rotor. (That´s why a heli without tail rotor might fly, but it would rotate on the main rotor axis, in the direction opposite of the main rotor spin direction.) The picture hints into that direction, but the text does not comment on it. – TheBlastOne Jan 15 '15 at 13:10
  • 1
    Not every helicopter has a tail rotor. The pedals control yaw, regardless of the mechanism. I would also urge you to disassociate collective from up/down. It adds/removes energy from the system, which could be altitude or speed (see "strongly coupled"), which is also true for forward / reverse cyclic. – rbp Jan 15 '15 at 13:19
  • The only helicopter that is a "real" helicopter (capable of hovering) and has no tail rotor is one with two main rotor blade discs installed on the same axis, but spinning in opposite directions, or with more than one main rotor, with their axes installed in different locations (Chinook). OK, or one that has an alternative "force generator" where a jet engine exhaust generates just the same force a tail rotor would generate (NOTAR systems). – TheBlastOne Jan 15 '15 at 13:36
  • here are 6 "real" helicopters that use non-tailrotor designs http://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/8642/how-can-a-helicopter-be-designed-without-a-tail-rotor – rbp Jan 15 '15 at 14:14
  • All of which fit into the categories I´ve outlined... – TheBlastOne Jan 15 '15 at 14:23
  • 1
    As I read it, I think this question was about the 'standard'-helicopter, thus featuring a tail-rotor. In order to keep the explanation simple and concise, I therefore only explained this type of helicopters. – ROIMaison Jan 15 '15 at 14:23
3

Think of a triangle of vectors.

When the rotor disk is exactly level, the thrust from the rotor acts vertically. If you tilt the rotor, you now have a slightly reduced vertical thrust (the thrust vector) and a horizontal component which will apply a force to the helicopter in the direction of that horizontal component.

As ROIMaison states, the cyclic control tilts the rotor disc as required.

Please excuse my lousy drawing skills.

Disc level

enter image description here

Disk titled

enter image description here

Because the vertical component is now reduced (the total thrust is the sum of the vertical and horizontal component), the helicopter will descend slightly since the vertical thrust no longer balances the weight. Therefore, a small increase in power is required achieved by increasing collective pitch. The engine then creates more torque which must be balanced with opposite torque from the tail rotor, achieved by moving the opposite pedal forwards.

As in all aircraft changes, there is a primary effect (tilting the disc in the direction of travel) and secondary affects of increased power and increased torque. This is why flying a helicopter needs adjustment of all three controls together.

To climb, you adopt a climbing attitude, by pulling back on the cyclic, which causes the nose to rise. Because the horizontal component of the total rotor thrust is now reduced (since the disc is now titled forward less), your speed will reduce unless you increase power by increasing the collective pitch which increase the horizontal component. This will need an input on the pedals to balance the correct torque.

To descend, you reduce power, which reduces the total rotor thrust. Since the vertical component no longer opposes the weight, the helicopter will descend. Since power is reduced, the horizontal component of the thrust is reduced and the helicopter will slow down. You push forward on the cyclic to increase the horizontal thrust and maintain speed. Of course, a pedal input is required to counter the reduced torque from the engine.

Simon
  • 31,213
  • 4
  • 141
  • 163
  • The disc does not tilt by itself. There is no mechanism on board to tilt it. Instead, rotor pitch is varied along the rotational axis so the blades generate more (or less) force on the left (or the right) disc sector, and AS A RESULT the disc tilts. I.e. the helicopter climbing and the helicopter turning ("tilting") rely on only one mechanism: blade pitch variation. – TheBlastOne Jan 15 '15 at 13:18
  • In fact, since the rotor is rotating, the pitch change is done 90° away from the place where the desired "tilt" is wanted, just like to make a turning wheel "tilt" left, you have to apply a force 90° away from the rotational axis (i.e. to turn left, you turn the wheel right in a plane 90% away from the axsis). (Sorry for my humble English.) – TheBlastOne Jan 15 '15 at 13:19
  • 1
    ROIMaison states "Cyclic stick (this cyclically changes the pitch blade, creating different amounts of lift at different points of the cycle)", which is something different than "tilting the disc". There is no specific hardware for the tilt. Collective and cyclic both control the blade pitch. Collective does it equally for all blade "location" on all circle sectors, while cyclic changes the blade pitch differently for different circle locations. – TheBlastOne Jan 15 '15 at 13:30
  • 1
    the teetering hinge tilts the entire rotor – rbp Jan 15 '15 at 15:20
  • 1
    @TheBlastOne I am aware of all this, being a helicopter pilot, but for this particular question, for the OP who clearly is not, thinking about the triangle of vectors whose size and shape is controlled by tilting the disc and/or changing power is a useful explanation. Otherwise, I could write 1500 words to include the differences in attitude and altitude control in different phases of flight to include dyssemmetry of lift, inflow roll, blowback, translational lift, tail rotor couples etc etc. Of course, moving the cyclic results in tilting the disc but is this really relevant in this case? – Simon Jan 15 '15 at 15:21
  • 1
    Well, I'd say yes, but your perspective might be a different one. For me, personally, it was a real "aha!" when I learned that the tilt is a result from the same piece of hardware as the upward thrust, namely: rotor blades, with pitch variation. Until then, I kept searching for the "tilter" on helicopters, and nobody understood what I was asking for. So I am not saying that I know better. I am just trying to point out that this is an aspect that is imho central to understanding where the "tilt" comes from. – TheBlastOne Jan 15 '15 at 15:25
2

Turn Control

In order to effect a turn a lateral acceleration (horizontally to the left or right relative to the direction of the vehicles motion) is needed. Consider a bicycle leaning towards the center of a turn. In an aircraft primarily two things happen.

  • The ailerons are used to bank the aircraft towards the center of the turn in order to tilt the lift vector.

  • Particularly in slow aircraft the rudder is used to adapt the rotation of the aircraft around the vertical axis to the changing direction. This ensures that no sideslip occurs, i.e. that the aircraft always points exactly in the direction of flight (in reference to the air).

Once a helicopter has significant forward speed the same principles apply. Via the stick the cyclic rotor control is used to bank the helicopter (slightly) towards the turn center. The torque pedals are then used to coordinate the turn (sync the change in direction with the turn speed of the helicopter).

Altitude Control

In order to change the altitude the flight path needs to be increased or decreased. Also two things need to happen.

  • The flight path needs to be changed via a short vertical acceleration (to bend it).

  • Then the aircraft needs to be stabilized / trimmed to maintain this path.

For fixed wing aircraft there are actually different techniques to do this. The most intuitive is to change the pitch of the aircraft via the elevator. Upon descending or climbing the thrust (engine setting) needs to be adapted. (A glider will adapt its speed accordingly). Another technique with classical fixed wing aircraft is to reduce (sink) or increase (climb) the engine power / thrust level.

Helicopters make use of their direct control of the lift via the collective control. (Subsequently this results in a change of rotor torque which needs to be compensated via the pedals and the engine settings.)

tssch
  • 1,025
  • 1
  • 7
  • 10
  • 2
    I guess you are not a helicopter pilot. This is too simple an explanation for helicopters. To climb, you first adopt a climbing attitude by pulling back on the cyclic. This starts the climb. Since the total thrust vector is now more vertical (you are climbing) an increase in power is needed to maintain speed (a helicopter can climb or descend with zero forward or backward speed). As more power is required, trim changes are required to maintain direction. You do not start a climb by pulling collective since this will result in an increase in speed. Descending is power, then attitude, then trim. – Simon Jan 14 '15 at 16:36
  • Helicopter in forward flight behaves just like airplane in all manoeuvres and uses the same sequence of control inputs. Only hover is special. – Jan Hudec Jan 15 '15 at 08:07
  • But helis don´t have ailerons, at least they don´t require them. – TheBlastOne Jan 15 '15 at 13:12
  • @Jan Hudec maybe the point is that most helicopters turn their main rotor disc AT CONSTANT SPEED at all times. More power means steeper blade pitch, not larger rotational speed. – TheBlastOne Jan 15 '15 at 13:45
  • @TheBlastOne: Helicopter don't have ailerons, but they have lateral axis of cyclic that has exactly the same effect on the aircraft and even quite similar principle. And it's totally irrelevant; I said same control inputs, not same control surface movements. – Jan Hudec Jan 15 '15 at 13:54
  • @TheBlastOne: Modern helicopters have constant speed rotors; the early ones required pilot to adjust throttle together with collective (one control element—up/down for collective, twist for power) to maintain the speed in acceptable range (and even with constant speed rotor the pilot has to pay attention to rpm, because he could loose rotor speed by exceeding maximum available power) – Jan Hudec Jan 15 '15 at 13:55
  • @JanHudec "Helicopter in forward flight behaves just like airplane in all manoeuvres" this is completely untrue. when you say "constant speed rotor" you're thinking like an airplane pilot, and the phrase makes no sense to a heli pilot – rbp Jan 15 '15 at 14:18
  • @rbp Yeah. But current state of art is: blade pitch control. I wouldn´t answer the question with yesterday´s state of art. It does not contribute to understanding how today´s helicopters work. In contrast, it confuses more than it clarifies. Also, there is a good reason why rotational speed now is usually constant, and blade pitch the primary control: It just works faster, is more secure (though more complicated to implement), and thus better in general. And nobody said rpm is not important. – TheBlastOne Jan 15 '15 at 14:27
  • @JanHudec Not true. Are you a helicopter pilot? I've got a few hundred on helis and a couple of lessons in fixed wing. Control inputs are very different and, not in the same order. There are some well known killers in helicopters which catch fixed wing pilots transitioning, for example, countering negative G. They do not behave just like a fixed wing, nor are inputs in the same sequence. For example, what happens in a fixed wing if you reduce power, and leave all other controls where they are? Now try this in a helicopter (actually, don't, you may well die). – Simon Jan 15 '15 at 19:19
  • 1
    @JanHudec Here is an even simpler example. Please tell me which fixed wing control provides the same functions as the collective lever? Since you assert that the control inputs are the same, there must be one? – Simon Jan 15 '15 at 20:15
  • @Simon: Stick corresponds to cyclic, power to collective. I now realize there is a difference though; aircraft is longitudinally stable, so it will respond to increase in power by pitching up and vice versa which a helicopter, being unstable, won't. – Jan Hudec Jan 15 '15 at 20:49
  • @JanHudec The collective does not change power. It changes the pitch of all blades together. On some helicopters, not all, there may be a correlator or engine management computer which will demand more or less power if pitch is changed but that is not the primary function of the collective. Power is controlled by the throttle or a FADEC or similar computer on jets. – Simon Jan 15 '15 at 20:54
  • @Simon: The collective does not change engine power, but it changes rotor power, that is the rate at which the rotor adds energy to the kinetic+potential energy of the craft, so for manoeuvring it behaves just like power in fixed-wing aircraft. To climb an aircraft you add power, to climb a helicopter you add collective (and pitch up in both). The fact the energy initially comes from rotational energy of the rotor that is subsequently replenished by correlating the engine power is the part specific to helicopters, but modern ones usually have automatic correlator so pilot does not care. – Jan Hudec Jan 15 '15 at 21:10
  • @JanHudec You are confusing power with thrust. Rotor thrust varies with collective but power does not since without increasing work done by the engine (energy over time), the total energy in the system is the same, IAW conservation of energy. Without a power change, you cannot gain potential energy without losing kinetic energy and vice-versa. If you were to increase collective pitch with no change in power, you would rapidly stall the blades since you are converting kinetic energy to potential energy (and increasing drag significantly). I am not aware of any definition of "rotor power". – Simon Jan 15 '15 at 22:36
  • @JanHudec The power required by the rotor is dependent on total rotor thrust but power is only derived from the engine, unless you convert one form or energy to another. This is exactly what an autorotation is. You are trading potential energy for kinetic energy. According to you, a helicopter could still climb if the engine failed! Finally, to climb a helicopter in forward flight, you use cyclic, not collective. I think it might help to state what experience you have since there is a lot of confusion here. – Simon Jan 15 '15 at 22:40
  • @Simon: When the engine fails and the pilot pulls the collective up (instead of pushing it down as needed for auto-rotation), the helicopter will briefly climb. It will however quickly slow down the rotor and then it will obviously crash. – Jan Hudec Jan 15 '15 at 23:26
  • 1
    @JanHudec Hi Jan. I'm going to give up. You were wrong to say that helicopters behave like fixed wings and have the same control inputs in all manouveurs except for hover. The is just plain wrong. You are also wrong about "rotor power" but since you have not stated your qualifications, nor have you read up on the appropriate references, I see no point in going on. Cheers – Simon Jan 16 '15 at 20:36
0

I so far experienced,the co-axial helicopter turns in forward flight or in hovering 360 degree turn,both can be done by reducing pitch angle of the opposite rotor(Clock wise or Anti-clockwise rotor) of turning direction which will be acting as torque effect as like a single rotor helicopter without tail rotor.

  1. Can someone clarify the relationship between aircraft speed, torque, prop length and pitch and how this applies to a helicopter.

Mentioned all terms are inter-related Speed- depends upon the torque(Engine Power)-Length of the blade/prop-the -lifting capacity of the helicopter depends upon on the blade area/disc loading-subsequently-Torque-pitch-to increase lift and thrust also depends on the engine power(Torque)-and all these are applied by the cyclic, collective and correlator governor and co-ordinated by mixer control unit. to make some one understand,it might take a long lecture which might take several hours.

  1. In addition I want to know if the amount of lift a helicopter generates changes dependant on pitch, how much does the pitch change?

To determine the actual changes of pitch angle for a certain amount of lift is a mathematical calculation,if you are to find out this in definite figure,you are to know the helicopter aerodynamics with mathematical terms.In a nut shell,you can say,the more lift is required,the more should be the pitch angle and the more should be the engine power. Thanks

Federico
  • 32,559
  • 17
  • 136
  • 184