I am looking at a question I found in the internet: why can a paraglider fly without a tail rudder and elevator assembly whereas a normal fixed wing aircraft can't?
One part of the answer is , the elevator helps to control pitch whereas the rudder controls yaw for a fixed wing aircraft.
A paraglider has flexible wings that can be deformed to control both the axis.
The other part that is vexing me : the tailplane also provides stability, not just axis control. So why is such (lack of) stability providing equipment not detrimental to a paraglider?
Even birds and there flexible-ish wings need a tail.
How do I even approach this question? Is it because the bird wings are not that flexible, and so the large tail feathers are necessary for fine control?
What about the fixed wing aircraft? Is it because the tubular shape causes the centre of lift and centre of gravity to be far away and so a tailplane is mandatory?
I would like a full mathematical answer please- thank you?