This is a photograph from the launch of an X-43 from the NASA owned and operated B-52 '008'. It appears that one engine is producing a plume of smoke in the photograph. Why is this?
Asked
Active
Viewed 1.0k times
41
-
21That's what you get when there is no cabin attendant to tell the crew this is non-smoking flight. – Rob Vermeulen Dec 13 '16 at 18:21
-
1@RobVermeulen She was commissioned in 1959... everyone smoked back then ;) – J... Dec 14 '16 at 13:31
-
@RobVermeulen Ladies and gentleman this is your captain speaking - I've just turned off the "No Smoking" signs. I figure if the plane's smoking why can't you? (Also can we talk about the soot marks behind those engine pods? Wash your planes, NASA!) – voretaq7 Dec 16 '16 at 21:54
2 Answers
54
@Adam is right. The aircraft, NB-52B has smoke generator installed to assist in tracking.
A smoke generator has been installed on the left wing of the Boeing NB-52B Stratofortress mothership to assist in tracking the airplane.
Its use during the test of X-38 is detailed here:
Outside I could see the white trail from the smoke generator in the number-2 engine nacelle of the NB-52B approaching from the east
... I aimed my telephoto nearly directly up at the tip of the smoke trail.
As the same aircraft was used during the X-43 tests, it certainly served the same purpose.
-
22So, paratroopers invented jumping out of a perfectly good airplane. Not to be one-upped, NASA decided to set a perfectly good plane on fire. Touche :) – DVK Dec 13 '16 at 20:48
31
My guess, and it is only a guess, is that they are using a smoke generator to make the B-52 aircraft easier to visualize. Typically for flight tests like this they would be doing optical tracking from the ground (essentially a telescope) and this would make it easier to locate the target. (I was going to add also for the pilot of the dropped aircraft, but the X-43 is unmanned)
Adam
- 2,157
- 11
- 14