13

While commercial airliner are parked at the gate, they have electrical power connected to the aircraft (if available at the airport). This needs to be disconnected before pushback - what is the process to do so?

  • How does the ground crew know it is safe / ok to disconnect ground power? (ask pilot if Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) is running?)
  • When will it be disconnected? As late as possible before push-back?

Thanks!

Stefan
  • 4,692
  • 4
  • 38
  • 75

1 Answers1

21

When is the GPU disconnected?

Airports have rules regarding APU use, to reduce noise and pollutants near airport gates.

Airline operating procedures usually specify when to start APU and engines. The idea is:

  • GPU energy is cheaper than APU energy.
  • Using the APU adds maintenance costs.

Hence GPU is used until the first engine is started, usually when hydraulic power is required for braking. That means GPU is disconnected just before pushback.

Airbus ECAM, generators status indicating GPU is currently providing energy. Source.

Disconnection

On the aircraft external power receptacle panel there are usually lights to indicate whether an external source is connected and in use.

enter image description here

B737 external electrical panel, source

To prepare for pushback, the crew make sure the APU is delivering electrical power, and isolate the GPU from the electrical bus to ensure no current is drawn from it.

The ground operator prepare to disconnect conditioned air and ground electrical supply. They check the white light indicates the aircraft is not using the GPU, and operate a switch on the plug to electrically disconnects the ground supply generator from the cable. The "CONNCT" light goes off and the cable is physically disconnected from the aircraft.

More on ground handling procedures: Cello Aviation B737 procedures.

Cable and plug

The GPU cable/plug contains 4 power conductors and pins: The three phases (A, B, C, also called "lines") and a neutral/ground (N or G).

However the cable has a specific design due to the presence of high currents and 400 Hz. Reactance is proportional to frequency. At 400 Hz cable reactance is 8 times the reactance at 50 Hz. While it doesn't generate heat like a pure resistance it still creates voltage drops.

A large part of this reactance is due to the strong magnetic field around the wires, itself resulting from the strong currents. This reactance varies when the cable is bent, due to the changing geometry of the field, leading to corresponding voltage variations.

The cable shows two other problems:

  • Large diameter conductors required by the high currents leave empty spaces in the cable section.

  • The significant skin effect at 400 Hz prevent electrons to reach the wire center, so using a large diameter is not effective to get a low resistance.

Fortunately enough these three problems can be mitigated with multiple smaller wires for each phase, still connected to the same pin of the plug. Usually two wires are used per phase and wires are distributed around the neutral so they cancel each other magnetic field:

enter image description here

Source

A, B, C, N/G are available at the corresponding pins of the plug:

enter image description here

Plug (source)

For the scale, the four largest holes have the diameter of a finger. You may also notice two smaller pins labeled E and F.

E/F control pins

For a 90 kVA GPU, each phase can provide 30 kVA at 115 V RMS, requiring 260 A RMS current.

If the connection is broken when such current flows, arcing occurs between the disconnected parts. They can melt down, and liquid metal can be projected around.

Just bear in mind the principle of hot disconnection is the one used for arc welding, with currents usually less than 300 A. But arc welding with 260 A on an aircraft is not recommended. In an accident involving a A320, where a power wire disconnected from a damaged plug (comparable to disconnecting the plug with power), the BEA noted:

At this moment, witnesses heard an explosion, the ground attendant saw an electric arc of around 30 cm at the connector and the ramp agent was thrown to the ground.

To prevent arcing, the GPU plug is fitted with a protection against hot disconnection. Two pins (E and F) of the cable plug are used for status exchange between the aircraft electrical system and the GPU. These pins are shorter than the power pins, therefore in normal conditions they are disconnected a short time before the power pins.

Source

This way, when the plug is disconnected, both the GPU and the aircraft can sense it and stop generating/using power to/from the corresponding plug before the first power pin is actually disconnected, preventing arcing.

enter image description here

Source

Additional features

Control wires can be used to connect optional systems to the GPU:

  • Red/green (ON/OFF) push-buttons for remote control of the GPU.

  • E/F pins fitted with a small switch to know when the cable connector is 90% inserted within the aircraft panel socket and the connection can be seen as established.

  • When the cable comes from the loading bridge, additional push-buttons for reel control: UP/DOWN, IN/OUT.

  • Sensors to detect reactance variation, hot cable/plug or broken neutral.

Conversely, LEDs on the plug can be switched on or off by the GPU using the control wires.

More information:

mins
  • 72,728
  • 27
  • 308
  • 441
  • Interesting that the image showing the cable layout is circular with 7 primary conductors, yet the connector you show is rectangular with only 6 connectors. Can you explain the difference or is that scope creep? – FreeMan Nov 14 '18 at 18:20
  • @FreeMan: The two A conductors are connected to the same point at each end of the cable, same for B and C. This is just a way to move electrons for each phase such that no (inductive) reactance is created by having an homogeneous magnetic field which cancels itself. The two small pins are for ON/OFF remote control. – mins Nov 14 '18 at 18:41
  • 1
    Ah! That makes sense. The green connector, then, actually has 2 extra pins (A, B, C, G, x & y) that, presumably, connect the various and sundry small wires shown in the somewhat generic cable cross-section. – FreeMan Nov 14 '18 at 18:44
  • Yes, the two extra pins are to remote control the GPU from the aircraft interface. – mins Nov 14 '18 at 18:47
  • "Currents required for 90 kVA under 115 V are about 100 A" your numbers seem to be off, 100A * 115V is 11.5KVA, even if we assume that it's a 115V P-N (~400V P-P) and the 100A is per-phase that still only adds up to 34.5KVA. – Peter Green Nov 15 '18 at 07:16
  • @PeterGreen: Correct, this figure is wrong. The relevant value should be the P-N intensity in the last phase assuming other phases have already been disconnected. With this completely unbalanced system, assuming other protections didn't work and ignoring effects created by the sudden raise in current, that would be around 1 kA. P-P is 200 V ($\small \sqrt{3} \times 115$). – mins Nov 15 '18 at 12:58
  • 1
    Delivering 10kVA as 1kA at 100V (and at 400Hz) is insane! What on earth went on that such a mad standard was dreamt up? And I thought the railways excelled at shooting themselves in the foot, electrically! – Dannie May 21 '19 at 22:33
  • 1
    @Dannie, sometimes they shoot themselves in the ear. 100kVA, not 10. Those cables are designed to sustain 4 kA per phase during 5s (300 A in normal use), while the temperature climbs to 200°C – mins May 22 '19 at 17:23
  • @Dannie Aircraft use 400Hz AC because the transformers are lighter than 50-60Hz ones, and 110V because the standard was developed in the US. – StephenS Nov 18 '21 at 18:22
  • @StephenS: Ah this transformers legend found in many answers including on this site... 400 Hz was chosen for electric motors torque and speed and was practical for the constant speed generator, not to save 10 kg on a transformer. – mins Nov 18 '21 at 18:49
  • @StephenS the higher frequency does make sense for the size of the magnetics, but going upto 400Hz from 50/60Hz is such a minor win (compared to the 100kHz kind of region you have in switching regulators) that the motor thing does seem more plausible historically. It's the Volts/Amps balance that seems crazy. If you're already changing frequency, changing voltage to, say, a much saner 1kV 100A for the same power is relatively little work and would save so much in terms of thermal/copper. I think it has to be all about history. I mean no one is charging EVs like this! – Dannie Nov 19 '21 at 11:25
  • @Dannie: 60Hz, 180Hz, 240Hz, 360Hz, 400Hz and 800Hz were initially considered [...] the frequency selection must take into account also the generator operating speed [...] suitable frequency values were 400Hz and 800Hz. The Army Air Corps in 1943 chose 400Hz as the standard frequency, since it appeared to be more feasible for the generator speed (e.g. 12000rpm for 4-pole machines). This ‘standard’ [...] has been made mandatory for use by the US Air Force in 1959 (MIL-STD-704). Source. – mins Jul 11 '22 at 22:22