Just a random question, would a sharp object pierce your muscle more(stabbed with the same amount of force) when the muscle is flexed or when relaxed?
Asked
Active
Viewed 2,220 times
7
-
I would say that it would depend largely on the muscle. – Rory M Feb 28 '12 at 19:41
-
lets say any large muscle, abdominals, hamstrings, shoulder, etc @RoryM Edit: or are you talking about the muscle density? – stackErr Feb 28 '12 at 19:44
-
Depends on the stabbing force and how sharp the object is. – kmm Feb 28 '12 at 21:11
-
I suppose in theory the density of the tissue has increased during contraction if you stab in the middle so (preparing for a possible physics disaster) that would mean less penetration for constant force from an identical object – Rory M Feb 28 '12 at 22:36
1 Answers
7
Well, if we look in very basic detail at how muscle contraction works within a myofibril of the sarcomere:
N.b. this isn't on a loop and only plays through seven times
The red lines represent actin filaments whilst the blue lines represent myosin filaments. During muscle contraction the filaments move over each other:
As shown in the above diagrams the "more contracted" a muscle is then the smaller the size of the H zone (the area where there are just myosin filaments).
So if we consider a penetrating impact that went through a plethora of identically aligned sarcomeres (obviously this is not the case in nature) then we could presume that (et ceteris paribus) the object would not penetrate as deeply into a contracted muscle as it will hit more tissue on its route than in a relaxed muscle.
Rory M
- 13,479
- 9
- 56
- 96
-
3Thanks for a very detailed and clearly explained answer! Pity i didnt take Bio during high school...interesting stuff – stackErr Mar 25 '12 at 12:16