Concerning the units in your equation none of them is correct (As all your formulations would end up in a square volume unit).
Definition of volumetric mass density
The density $ \rho $ is given as
$$ \rho = \frac{m}{V} $$
resulting in a mass and density dependent Volume as
$$ V = \frac{m}{\rho} $$
Direct way
Although you could calculate this by just substituting the physical quantities by the given values and units, and then take care of the unit conversion afterward:
\begin{align}
V
&= \frac{m}{\rho} \\
&= \frac{100\,\mathrm{g}}{681.9\,\mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m^{-3}}} =\\
&= \frac{100\,\mathrm{g}\,\mathrm{m^{3}}}{681.9\,\mathrm{kg}} = \frac{100\,\mathrm{g} \cdot \left(10^2\,\mathrm{cm}\right)^{3}}{681.9 \cdot (10^3\,\mathrm{g})} =\\
&= \frac{100 \cdot 10^6\,\mathrm{cm}^{3}}{681.9 \cdot 10^3} = \frac{100 \cdot 10^3}{681.9}\,\mathrm{cm}^{3} =\\
&\approx 146.65\,\mathrm{cm}^{3} \equiv 146.65\,\mathrm{ml}
\end{align}
I would suggest to convert the density from $\mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m^{-3}}$ to $\mathrm{g}\,\mathrm{cm^{-3}}$ as a first step.
Easier way
Of course easiness is something subjective, but I believe this is easier to use.
Calculate conversion-factor for density
First the combined conversion-factor for the units-fraction is calculated
$$ \frac{\mathrm{kg}}{\mathrm{m}^3} \stackrel{\left[1\right]}{=} \frac{\left(10^3\,\mathrm{g}\right)}{\left(10^2\,\mathrm{cm}\right)^3} \stackrel{\left[2\right]}{=} \frac{10^3\,\mathrm{g}}{10^6\,\mathrm{cm}^3} \stackrel{\left[3\right]}{=} 10^{-3}\,\frac{\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{cm}^3} $$
- Start with substituting each units SI prefix:
- Care has to be taken with the conversion of $ \mathrm{m}^3 $, since the power applies to the whole substituted expression ($ \mathrm{m}^3 = \left(10^2\,\mathrm{cm}\right)^3 $).
- In the last step the exponential expressions are summarized ($ \frac{10^3}{10^6} = 10^{3-6} = 10^{-3} $).
Then calculate the new numeric value of the density in the target unit:
$$ \rho = 681.9\,\mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m^{-3}} \stackrel{\left[4\right]}{\equiv} 681.9 \cdot \left(10^{-3}\,\mathrm{g}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}\right) \stackrel{\left[5\right]}{=} 0.6819\,\mathrm{g}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3} $$
- Substitute the unit with the previously calculated expression
- Multiply the numeric terms
Calculate the volume
Now the unit-adjusted density is used:
$$ V = \frac{m}{\rho} = \frac{100\,\mathrm{g}}{0.6819\,\mathrm{g}\,\mathrm{cm^{-3}}} = \frac{100}{0.6819}\,\mathrm{cm^{3}} \approx 146.65\,\mathrm{cm}^{3} \equiv 146.65\,\mathrm{ml} $$
Conversion-factors
According to SI Prefixes the following applies:
\begin{align}
1\,\mathrm{m} &\equiv 10^2\,\mathrm{cm}\\
1\,\mathrm{kg} &\equiv 10^3\,\mathrm{g}
\end{align}
And of course:
$$ 1\,\mathrm{cm}^3 \equiv 1\,\mathrm{ml} $$
$$ ... $$or\begin{align} ... \end{align}than forcing it in inline style$\displaystyle ... $– Martin - マーチン Feb 03 '22 at 23:07\displaystylein the same MathJax sequence is unnecessary, only the first one takes effect. So you have a lot of overhead and it takes much longer to load. And please keep in mind: while MathJax uses LaTeX syntax, it absolutely is not LaTeX. – Martin - マーチン Feb 04 '22 at 19:52\displaystylein a sequence, it is indeed redundant in the current text, but I noticed that\displaystyle\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}}shows up differently than\displaystyle\frac{a}{\displaystyle\frac{b}{c}}, which suggests to me that displaystyle is simply not a global setting. – Nayuki Feb 05 '22 at 05:43$$...$$, or (probably better)\begin{align}...\end{align}would at least allow you to control the amount of vertical space between successive lines. That aside, one of the more impactful differences between MathJax and LaTeX is that on Chemistry.SE there are easier ways to typeset quantities with units; you can use$\pu{3.14 J/(K mol)}$--> $\pu{3.14 J/(K mol)}$, or since you prefer the fractions,$\pu{3.14 J//K mol}$-> $\pu{3.14 J//K mol}$. https://mhchem.github.io/MathJax-mhchem/ – orthocresol Feb 08 '22 at 18:30