I am concerned about the stereogenic centres. But in this compound there is no chiral centres present. Sulphur is $\mathrm{sp^2}$-hybridized, so it cannot be chiral anyway. But I can see there is no symmetry present in this compound. Will this be a sufficient reason to tell the compound optically active?
Asked
Active
Viewed 310 times
3
orthocresol
- 71,033
- 11
- 239
- 410
Sarah jane
- 754
- 1
- 9
- 20
-
2This compound is in fact optically active as the sulfur has 4 different substituents, one of them being a lone pair. – Tan Yong Boon Dec 31 '17 at 16:35
-
3That makes it chiral. But if the lone pair can umbrella-invert like ammonia you do not see optical activity. – Oscar Lanzi Dec 31 '17 at 16:54
-
3Possible duplicate of Can heteroatoms with lone pairs be chiral centres? – orthocresol Dec 31 '17 at 17:09
