0

There is a question in my organic chemistry textbook with an answer. What it doesn't explain (and neither does my theory textbook, I checked) is the mechanism involved in the reaction. The reaction is as follows:

synthesis of 5‐(iodomethyl)oxolan‐2‐one

Can someone help me?

andselisk
  • 37,604
  • 14
  • 131
  • 217
  • If the reaction was simply iodine adding to a double bond do you know how it works? – Waylander Jul 13 '19 at 17:21
  • Well, yes. A Iodonium ion is formed, then another iodine attacks the ion from the other side, is that not right? – Claudio Lancia Jul 13 '19 at 17:26
  • Well, as product suggests, something different attacked... – Mithoron Jul 13 '19 at 17:31
  • 1
    @ClaudioLancia Well I- is not a great nucleophile, and internal nucleophilic attack goes better than external nucleophilic attack. Carboxylate may not be a great nucleophile but it is internal, and the formation of 5-membered rings is favoured. See where this is going? – Waylander Jul 13 '19 at 17:33
  • Ok, so does the carboxylate form the ring before the Iodine attack? – Claudio Lancia Jul 13 '19 at 17:40
  • 5
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iodolactonization – orthocresol Jul 13 '19 at 17:43
  • 1
    Oh, I get it now! Thanks a lot for the help. I didn't know the name of the reaction (especially since the exercise was in the alkene section, and my book didn't mention anything about Halolactonization), so this is a great help! – Claudio Lancia Jul 13 '19 at 18:05
  • 2
    @ClaudioLancia Now that you understand, could you write up your own answer to summarize what you learned? – Karsten Jul 13 '19 at 19:23

1 Answers1

1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iodolactonization I+ reacts with the CC-π electron donor. A cyclic iodonium three-membered ring intermediate is formed. The carboxylate group opens the electrophilic intermediate to form the product lactone. 5-membered rings (gamma-lactones) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactone are prefered due to optimum entropic and enthalpic parameters of activation.

Oscar Lanzi
  • 56,895
  • 4
  • 89
  • 175
  • Uh ... Why the -1? – Oscar Lanzi Jul 13 '19 at 19:17
  • @OscarLanzi Well, it's not my downvote, but there are many bad details - links to improve, weird wording/terminology, e.g. it's simply cyclic iodonium not "epi-iodium" etc. – Mithoron Jul 13 '19 at 21:58
  • In this case, the regioselectivity (to form the 5-membered instead of the 6-membered ring) also has a stereoelectronic factor: https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/106846/16683 – orthocresol Jul 14 '19 at 06:48