2

If I had a molecule of a single element such as atmospheric oxygen O2, and I added energy to decompose it into two separate oxygen atoms (i.e. O2 + ENERGY –– 2 O ) is this a chemical or physical change?

John
  • 47
  • 1
  • Please see my response on chemical and physical changes https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/131474/why-is-solubility-often-listed-as-a-chemical-property-isnt-the-action-of-disso/131477#131477 – AChem May 26 '20 at 16:40
  • 1
    At an elementary level, your decomposition of O2 molecule into O atoms is a chemical change. – AChem May 26 '20 at 16:42
  • Thanks for the feedback. I assumed that this was a chemical reaction because the chemical formula is changing. It does seem the distinction between physical and chemical changes can get a bit nebulous though. – John May 26 '20 at 17:14
  • 1
    Yes and in the long term this labeling is useless. – AChem May 26 '20 at 17:32
  • Something like physical and chemical "change" has only notion in some introductory textbooks. Chemical reaction is the important term. – Mithoron May 27 '20 at 19:19

1 Answers1

5

It is a chemical change

The aspect of this that is probably confusing you is that both the product and the result in the case of an element are still a form of the element.

But elements can exist in different chemical forms and moving between them is still a chemical process. A relevant example is the reaction occurring mostly in the upper atmosphere that converts dioxygen (O2) to ozone (O3). This is a specific example of what happens when you add energy (in this case from UV light) to an oxygen molecule in the presence of other oxygen molecules: the split-apart oxygen atoms react to form ozone (which is more stable than a free oxygen atom). This is clearly a chemical change as the molecular structure is different, though ozone is still elementary oxygen so the element has not changed.

matt_black
  • 35,967
  • 4
  • 86
  • 173