9

The $\mathrm{p}K_\mathrm{a}$ of acetone is 19, whereas the $\mathrm{p}K_\mathrm{a}$ of cyclohexanol is 16.

However, acetone is resonance stabilized and its major resonance structure displays the negative charge on an oxygen atom, like cyclohexanol. Is there any qualitative reason to explain why acetone is less acidic than cyclohexanol?

Thank you very much.

mhchem
  • 3,316
  • 2
  • 16
  • 34
makamoe
  • 99
  • 1

2 Answers2

1

if you consider the structure of acetone, it has 2 $\ce{CH3}$ groups and a $\ce{C}$ double bond $\ce{O}$ ($\ce{C=O}$). Therefore, for the $\ce{H}$ to disassociate, it must be removed from the $\ce{CH3}$ group which leaves now a $\ce{C=O}$, $\ce{CH2}$, and a $\ce{CH3}$ group where the negative charge lies on $\ce{C}$ a part of the $\ce{CH2}$ group. Conversely, the cyclohexanol would have the negative charge lying on the $\ce{O}$ because the $\ce{H}$ a part of the $\ce{OH}$ group would be removed. Just by simple electron negativity rules, $\ce{O}$ is much more favored to possess a (partial) negative charge than $\ce{C}$. Thus, cyclohexanol is a much more stable acid than acetone which is reflected in its $\mathrm{p}K_\mathrm{a}$ value.

Mathew Mahindaratne
  • 39,943
  • 27
  • 55
  • 107
bmatt
  • 19
  • 4
  • 1
    While that is true, my point was that with acetone, the negative charge can be on an oxygen as well (in the major resonance structure). Therefore, it's not just the carbon atom that bears the charge. – makamoe May 23 '18 at 16:21
0

Acetone has no resonance structures, it's enolate has. However the second one, with the negative charge on the carbon atom, is just very, very unfavourable. So there is no real stabilisation.

So both of your deprotonated species have a negative charge on the oxygen atom, but coming from acetone, you also have to create an expensive double bond!

Karl
  • 12,053
  • 2
  • 30
  • 61