0

Is there in psychology an explanation and/or term that describes the phenomena that exists where people perceive a solution to a problem as “simple” after the solution has been found? I have noticed in my many years of working with people that there are some who claim the solution to a problem was “simple” - and take great pride in this - but only after the solution has been found. Of course, many things seem “simple” or “obvious” after they are known.

Example: Fixing a car.

A mechanic needs to fix a car the problem area of which he does not know “specifically” but “generally” and he has to test each part he removes. The parts are A, B, C, D and E. He has to remove parts B, C, D and E just to get to part A, all of which are time-consuming to remove (except part A). Part A turns out to be the faulty part and it’s easy to replace - just two screws. The boss (who is a mechanic himself but with higher rank within the company) says that the repair was “simple” - just had to change part A.

(Think an electrical system issue - battery, alternator, starter, starter relay).

Is that “oversimplification bias”? I don’t know if such a bias exists.

tale852150
  • 424
  • 2
  • 7
  • 2
    Possible duplicate of https://psychology.stackexchange.com/q/15668/7001, https://psychology.stackexchange.com/q/3801/7001, https://psychology.stackexchange.com/q/4632/7001 – Arnon Weinberg Nov 10 '19 at 08:55
  • @ArnonWeinberg Hello Arnon - your response is very good. But expertise has nothing to do with the phenomena that I am referring to. The phenomena I have observed seems to be more akin to “hindsight is 20-20”. Thank you. – tale852150 Nov 10 '19 at 11:35
  • 2
    I see. In that case, you may want to check out Hindsight Bias. – Arnon Weinberg Nov 10 '19 at 16:41

1 Answers1

2

As @Arnon suggested in the comments, this looks to be a case of the hindsight bias, especially given the reference to "hindsight is 20/20" in a comment.

Via Wikipedia:

Hindsight bias, also known as the knew-it-all-along phenomenon[1] or creeping determinism,[2] refers to the common tendency for people to perceive events that have already occurred as having been more predictable than they actually were before the events took place.[3][4] As a result, people often believe, after an event has occurred, that they would have predicted, or perhaps even would have known with a high degree of certainty, what the outcome of the event would have been, before the event occurred.

Bryan Krause
  • 7,376
  • 3
  • 13
  • 23