3

I've seen a slick trick done in some maker spaces. They have a big room full of project desks. Above each desk is an air hose on a retractable reel... And a NEMA L14-20 receptacle.

Dangling off the receptacle is a pendant: a hefty cord, properly strain relief'd, and it dangles about a foot above the desktop, with a 2-gang junction box with two of the usual NEMA 5-15 duplex receptacles. These exploit the MWBC in the usual way, sharing neutral and ground with each of the two hot's going to a different receptacle.

What's wrong with this? My intuition is that this wouldn't be legal either because of the MWBC or the pendant.

One of these maker spaces is on a site with highly professional property management, but on the other hand I've seen blatant codevio's there too.

Harper - Reinstate Monica
  • 300,628
  • 26
  • 286
  • 734
  • 2
    What makes this different from a busway pendant drop in your eyes? Those clearly can carry a multi-wire branch circuit (they have to in order to serve 3ph loads)... – ThreePhaseEel Oct 17 '17 at 00:11
  • I agree why would you think it is a problem. Max voltage to ground 120v leg to leg 240 well within code standards. – Ed Beal Jan 03 '18 at 09:09

2 Answers2

2

Can you serve a multi-wire branch circuit off a pendant?

YES

What's wrong with this?

Sorry code cop. Nothing

In the situation you describe, the pendant is also, not permanently installed equipment. Code has no business looking further than that L14-20 outlet.

IMHO, it was an unnecessary expense to use the L14-20 outlet, and the corresponding plug, but its neither unsafe nor illegal.

1

This is fine

NEC 400.7(A)(1) is what provides the general permission for pendants of flexible cord:

400.7 Uses Permitted.

(A) Uses. Flexible cords and cables shall be used only for the following:

(1) Pendants.

While MWBCs are not specifically stated as permitted in Article 400, the MWBC-specific neutral ampacity text in 400.5(A):

A neutral conductor that carries only the unbalanced current from other conductors of the same circuit shall not be required to meet the requirements of a current-carrying conductor.

In a 3-wire circuit consisting of two phase conductors and the neutral conductor of a 4-wire, 3-phase, wye-connected system, a common conductor carries approximately the same current as the line-to-neutral currents of the other conductors and shall be considered to be a current-carrying conductor.

On a 4-wire, 3-phase, wye circuit where more than 50 percent of the load consists of nonlinear loads, there are harmonic currents present in the neutral conductor and the neutral conductor shall be considered to be a current-carrying conductor.

is a strong clue that MWBCs can be routed over cordage using any of the provisions in NEC 400.7(A). (Also, range and dryer circuits are MWBCs by the Art. 100 definition of the term, and routinely run over cords to from wall-socket to final desination.)

So, as long as the pendant is strain relieved properly as per 400.10:

400.10 Pull at Joints and Terminals. Flexible cords and cables shall be connected to devices and to fittings so that tension is not transmitted to joints or terminals.

and routed into the receptacle box as per 400.14:

400.14 Protection from Damage. Flexible cords and cables shall be protected by bushings or fittings where passing through holes in covers, outlet boxes, or similar enclosures.

and 314.23(H)(1):

(H) Pendant Boxes. An enclosure supported by a pendant shall comply with 314.23(H)(1) or (H)(2).

(1) Flexible Cord. A box shall be supported from a multiconductor cord or cable in an approved manner that protects the conductors against strain, such as a strain-relief connector threaded into a box with a hub.

the NEC takes no issue with this setup. (Think of it like a cord pendant dropped from a busway in an industrial plant, only with ordinary wiring methods to a L14-20 instead of the busway and busway plug.)

ThreePhaseEel
  • 83,293
  • 29
  • 137
  • 230