I understand the basic/overall meaning of both, just as well as my electrician co-students. However, I really would like some more precise definitions than what I have been able to find so far. I find it frustrating not having proper definitions, because a) I am constantly in doubt if I am using the terms properly when writing reports or other school work, b) when reading about fx requirements for PE conductors, do those requirements also concern PB (and vice versa).
Here are a few specific questions that I would like settled once and for all if possible.
Are PE-conductors a subset of PB-conductors? You could argue this, since any two objects connected with separate PE-conductors both ending up in the same PE terminal, will be equipotential. Obviously, a PB-conductor directly between the two will have lower impedance and thus be better at achieving equipotential, but still.
Are PB-conductors a subset of PE-conductors? That depends on the definition of PE-conductors, but often PE-conductors are described as if their main characterization is that they allow either an over current detection device or a fault current detection device to shut off the power if an object is electrified. And if that is the characterization, then an equipotential bondings directly between objects will also help make sure that this happens, and in some cases these bonds are the only reason why it happens.
Are they disjoint sets? So that any of these protective conductors is always strictly either a PE-conductor or a PB-conductor?
Or are they overlapping? That means some of these protective conductors are PE but not PB, some are PB but not PE, while some are both. If so, please provide an example.
If possible please provide sources for your answer, and please provide examples.