2

Why does positive phase and gain margins cause any system to be stable whereas negative phase and gain margins cause the system to be unstable ?

TVV
  • 25
  • 6

1 Answers1

3

This is linked to the Nyquist stability criterion, which comes down to the number of encirclements of the minus one point of the open-loop in the Nyquist diagram. Namely the number of unstable closed-loop poles will be equal to the number open-loop unstable poles minus the number of counterclockwise encirclements of the minus one point.

A negative phase margin means that you enter the unit disk, with the minus one point to your right (which is a part of a clockwise encirclement of the minus one point). You can only prevent an encirclement by decreasing in phase and go to the positive real axis outside the unit disk, to close the loop from the Nyquist contour, if you add unstable poles to the open-loop system. Adding this also still makes the closed-loop unstable. However the opposite does not have to be true, that positive phase margin means that the closed-loop will be stable. Namely when the open-loop system is unstable it is possible to have positive phase margin, while the closed-loop system is unstable. So positive phase margin is necessary but not sufficient for closed-loop stability.

I am not sure if a negative gain margin has any practical meaning, because multiplying by a negative number also induces 180° of phase shift. So in order to identity such a margin you need to find a crossing of a multiple of 360°. You can get that the closed-loop will become unstable when you multiply the open-loop by a negative number, however the existence of a negative gain margin does not mean that the closed-loop will be unstable.

fibonatic
  • 1,653
  • 9
  • 10
  • Sorry I couldn't understand you completely – TVV Jun 01 '16 at 14:23
  • @TVV What part did you not understand? Do you know the Nyquist stability criterion? – fibonatic Jun 01 '16 at 14:24
  • I don't understand this " You can only prevent an encirclement by decreasing in phase and go to the positive real axis, to close the loop from the Nyquist contour, if you add unstable poles to the open-loop system. Adding this also makes the closed-loop unstable." – TVV Jun 01 '16 at 14:29
  • I know Nyquist stability criterion. – TVV Jun 01 '16 at 14:33
  • Why should the curve go on to complete the encirclement if we don't prevent it ? Also I have only known that open loop poles increase the stability of (closed loop) system . – TVV Jun 01 '16 at 14:40
  • @TVV Assuming that you have a system with real valued coefficients for the polynomials in numerator and denominator, then the system will be its complex conjugate for negative frequencies. In the Nyquist diagram this translates to a mirror image of the curve of positive frequencies along the real axis. So at a frequency of zero and infinity the system should return a real value (otherwise the function would be discontinues). For now I will also assume that you only enter the unit disk once (and don't leave it). – fibonatic Jun 01 '16 at 15:02
  • @TVV So at zero you start somewhere on the real line with an absolute value bigger than one, for some frequency you enter the unit disk with negative phase (with positive imaginary part) and at infinity you go to somewhere on the real line with an absolute value smaller than one. Now if you start on the negative real line and you mirror the curve you will have encircled the minus one point in clockwise direction. But if you start on the positive real line than you do not encircle the minus one point at all. – fibonatic Jun 01 '16 at 15:03