1

In my book, there is a differentiation of two types of personenbezeichnung made, it is categorized as primär and sekundär, however this is never explained further.

It's about semantics.

Examples:

Primär: Mensch, Gast, Laie, Passagier, Insasse, Star, Flüchtling, Abkömmling, ...-ling

Sekundär: Vormund, Figur, Person, Putzkraft, ...-kraft, ...-hilfe, Wesen, Mitglied, Opfer, Individuum, Geschöpf.

I do not understand the difference between them. I have looked up "primär" and "sekundär" in this context but I can't find more about it. Note: It is in a professional publication by an educated author, so there is reason to understand this distinction.

EagleFliesBanana
  • 3,382
  • 4
  • 17
  • 1
    I understand the idea but the examples make no sense. – Janka Sep 16 '23 at 18:22
  • @Janka They are from the book https://www.winter-verlag.de/en/news/ni12950c933c188aabffeafdf/Neuerscheinung_Studien_zum_genderneutralen_Maskulinum/ I've not changed any. Page 39. – EagleFliesBanana Sep 16 '23 at 18:50
  • I was about to ask: Could it be that the distinction is about which terms are masculine in a primary sort of way? For a moment I thought: the ones in the first set have masculine gender, but all in the second set are feminine or neuter... WAIT except "Vormund". But still? – Alazon Sep 16 '23 at 19:39
  • @Alazon That is probably the way in which it was intended. – EagleFliesBanana Sep 16 '23 at 19:45
  • 1
    I’m voting to close this question because it is not about the German language per se, but about (linguistic or philosophical?) concepts that are independent of a particular language. – Björn Friedrich Sep 18 '23 at 08:45

1 Answers1

1

Primärbegriff and Sekundärbegriff are fundamental classifications for symbols in semantics. Here, those terms seem to be fenced in to symbols that denote persons.

tofro
  • 64,637
  • 2
  • 85
  • 197
  • 1
    What could be the reason for "Mitglied" being sekundär, while "Mensch" is primär? – EagleFliesBanana Sep 16 '23 at 17:51
  • 1
    You would need to read about the theory of semantic symbols in human languages (the English term seems to be "primary and secondary symbols"). In principle, a primary symbol is the thing itself, very objectively without any influence of human perceiption, a secondary one is thats subjectively perceived with all possible assumptions not even in the term. Examples would be "man" as "male human" for a primary symbol, "teacher" primarily assumed to be a male teacher (even if it could be a female as well). – tofro Sep 16 '23 at 21:53
  • Okay, thank you for the answer! – EagleFliesBanana Sep 16 '23 at 22:35