This answer is a nearly identical copy of falagar's beautiful answer here, all credit goes to him.
For the sake of legibility let $x_k:=\tfrac{k\pi}{2m+1}$ for $k=1,\ldots,m$. By Euler's formula we have the identity
$$(\cos x_k+i\sin x_k)^{2m+1}=(-1)^k,$$
for each $k$. The binomial expansion of the left hand side gives us
$$\sum_{j=0}^{2m+1}\binom{2m+1}{j}(i\sin x_k)^j(\cos x_k)^{2m+1-j}=(-1)^k.$$
Taking the imaginary parts of both sides shows that the terms with odd $j$ sum to zero:
$$\sum_{j=0}^m\binom{2m+1}{2j+1}(-1)^j(\sin x_k)^{2j+1}(\cos x_k)^{2m-2j}=0.$$
Dividing both sides by $(\sin x_k)(\cos x_k)^{2m}$ we find that
$$\sum_{j=0}^m\binom{2m+1}{2j+1}(-1)^j(\tan x_k)^{2j}=\sum_{j=0}^m\binom{2m+1}{2j+1}\left(-(\tan x_k)^2\right)^j=0,$$
This means that $-(\tan x_k)^2$ is a root of the polynomial
$$\sum_{j=0}^m\binom{2m+1}{2j+1}X^j=0,$$
for $k=1,\ldots,m$, and the values of $-(\tan x_k)^2$ are distinct for distinct values of $k$. Hence these are all roots of the polynomial above, and by Vieta's formulas its roots sum to
$$-\frac{\tbinom{2m+1}{2m-1}}{\tbinom{2m+1}{2m+1}}=-\binom{2m+1}{2m-1}=-m(2m+1).$$
May a give you a tip? We don't usually write the multiplication symbol in algebraic manipulations, unless necessary. For example , you write $2\pi $ not $2 \cdot \pi$ but you DO write $2\cdot 3 \cdot 4$ in order not to confuse this with the number $234$ (two hundred and thirty four).
– Tolaso Jul 09 '15 at 14:47@Chaviaras michalis Could you clarify what the summation is over ? Because at W|A link there is no specific place. W|A takes it over $m$.
– Tolaso Jul 09 '15 at 14:56$$\sum_{k=1}^{100} \tan^2 (k\pi/(200+1))$$
is equal to $20100$ which is correct. So, it is true. So, all that remains is a proof. And I guess that it will telescope. But until I search it , I cannot be sure.
– Tolaso Jul 09 '15 at 15:03