Are there literal interpretations of the terms "nowhere dense" and "dense-in-itself" from which these terms' definitions follow? If I were to guess what it means for a subset $A$ of a topological space $X$ to be "nowhere dense", I'd say it means that for all subsets $B$ of $X$ (these are the "where"s), the closure, in $B$, of $A\cap B$ is not all of $B$.
Question 1: Is this notion equivalent to the true definition of "nowhere dense", which is that $\text{int}(\text{cl}(A)) = \varnothing$? The answer here seems to be lacking according to its sole comment.
Question 2: I can't even think of a literal interpretation of "dense-in-itself". Can anybody offer one which is equivalent, or at least sheds some light on, the true definition, which is that $A$ has no isolated points?