11

Let $A$ be a commutative ring. Let $A[[x]]$ be the ring of formal power series in one variable. Can we determine the structure of the automorphism group of $A[[x]]$ over $A$?

This is a related question.

Makoto Kato
  • 42,602

1 Answers1

10

A continuous automorphism $\psi$ of $A[[x]]$ is determined by what it does to $x$ and what it does to the elements of $A$. If $\psi$ leaves elements of $A$ fixed, as I believe you are specifying, then the only question is which elements of $A$ may occur as $x^\psi$ (I write the image of $x$ under $\psi$ this way to avoid later confusion). Since $x$ itself is “analytically nilpotent”, by which I mean that its powers converge to $0$, continuity implies that $x^\psi$ must be a.n. as well. As you know from the comments to your recent post, any such series $u(x)=\sum\alpha_ix^i\in A[[x]]$ will definitely determine a homomorphism from $A[[x]]$ to itself.

Then two questions remain: precisely which are the analytically nilpotent elements of $A[[x]]$, and precisely what characterizes invertible series (to make $\psi$ bijective). If $A$ has discrete topology, then the set of a.n. elements of $A[[x]]$ is just $xA[[x]]$, but for a general topological ring, I’m not at all sure what the answer might be. But suppose $A$ is complete under a topology given by the powers of some ideal $I$ for which $\bigcap_n I^n=(0)$. Then when we call $\sqrt I$ the radical of $I$, that is the set of all elements of $A$ for which some positive power lands in $I$ (so that $\sqrt I$ is an ideal of $A$), then $\sqrt{I}+xA[[x]]$ is the set of all a.n. elements of $A[[x]]$.

What about invertibility of a series $u(x)=\sum_0^\infty\alpha_ix^i$? You’ve already seen that if $A$ has discrete topology and $\alpha_0=0$, $u$ is invertible if and only if $\alpha_1$ has a reciprocal in $A$. Again, in the general case of a topological ring, I don’t know the answer, but in the interesting case that $A$ is complete under the $I$-adic topology mentioned before, all that’s necessary again is that $\alpha_1$ should have reciprocal in $A$. The only proof of this that I know involves Weierstrass Preparation, but I don’t doubt that others have more direct arguments.

As an example of a nontrivial, maybe even nonobvious automorphism of the most general type, consider the $\psi$ for which $x^\psi=u(x)=p -x + x^p\in{\mathbb{Z}}_p[[x]]$. The constant ring is complete under the $(p)$-adic topology, so everything I said before applies. The issue of what kind of noncontinuous automorphisms of $A[[x]]$ there might be, I leave to you.

Lubin
  • 62,818
  • 1
    Whoops! You don’t need Weierstrass for that: Newton’s method works fine. (Sorry) – Lubin Jul 21 '12 at 20:48
  • You indicate that there may be other ways than WPT of showing a series $u(x)$ in $xA[[x]]$ with linear coefficient $\alpha_1$ in $A^\times$ is invertible as a power series (wrt composition). Here is one: use Hensel’s lemma in $A[[x]][[y]]$ on the power series $f(y) = u(y) - x$. Since $f(0) = u(0) - x = -x$ and $f’(0) = \alpha_1$, we have $|f(0)|_x < 1$ and $f(0) \in A[[x]]^\times$, so a version of Hensel for power series implies there is a unique $v(x)$ in $xA[[x]]$ s.t. $f(v(x)) = 0$, which means $u(v(x)) = x$. Here $A$ can be an any commutative ring, where WPT does not apply to $A[[x]]$. – KCd Mar 11 '21 at 22:50
  • 1
    Oh, @KCd, I wasn’t worrying about using Weierstrass to see that series without constant were invertible. That’s clear just from the degree-by-degree computations one goes through to construct the inverse. I was (falsely) claiming necessity of WPT for finding inverse when the constant term was small. – Lubin Mar 11 '21 at 23:20