It's known (see here for example) that after a rescaling of the metric $\tilde{g}=e^{2\omega}g$, we can find a new connection $\tilde\nabla$ associated to the new metric:
$ \tilde\nabla _X Y = \nabla _X Y + (X \omega )Y + (Y \omega )X - g(X,Y) \operatorname{grad}\omega \tag{1}, $
where $\nabla$ is the Levi-Civita connection of $(M,g)$. In coordinates:
$ \tilde\Gamma^{k}_{ij}=\Gamma^{k}_{ij} + \delta_{i}^{k} \partial_j \omega + \delta_{j}^{k} \partial_i \omega - g_{i j} g^{k l} \partial_{l} \omega. \tag{2} $
My question is: is the new connection $\tilde\nabla$ compatible with the new metric $\tilde g$? I am using Equation (1) together with the property
$ X[\tilde g(Y,Z)] = (\tilde\nabla_X\tilde g)(Y,Z)+\tilde g(\tilde\nabla_XY,Z)+\tilde g(Y,\tilde\nabla_XZ)\tag{3}, $
but I am not getting $\tilde\nabla\tilde g = 0$. Instead $\tilde\nabla\tilde g$ is proportional to the new metric. Is this right?