0

In a question taken from Discrete Mathematic With Applications

A question tries to prove $2^{2n}-1$ is divisible by 3.

In the solution it has $$2^{2k}(3+1)-1$$ $$2^{2k}.3+(2^{2k}-1)$$ What happened to the 1 in (3+1) ? are they saying 1 was equivalent to $2^{2k}$?

Bill Dubuque
  • 272,048

3 Answers3

1

They just expanded the term with the first term by multiplying out the parentheses:

$$2^{2k}(3+1)-1=2^{2k}(3)+2^{2k}(1)-1=2^{2k}(3)+(2^{2k}-1)$$

smcc
  • 5,694
1

$2^{2n}= 4^n$. But $4\equiv1\pmod3$ Hence $2^{2n}\equiv 1\pmod 3$.

0

No, $1$ is not equivalent to $2^{2k}$. But the dsitributive law says that $2^{2k}(3+1)=3\cdot 2^{2k}+2^{2k}$. Now substract $-1$ from it. In case you want to prove that this is divisible by $3$ by induction, then see this MSE-question.

Dietrich Burde
  • 130,978