We know that $\mathbb E[XY]$ is a scalaire product on $L^2(\mathbb P)$. In a book (an introduction to stochastic differential equation of Evans) page 30-31, it's written that $\mathbb E[X\mid Y]$ can be seen as the orthogonal projection of $X$ on $Y$. So, why $$\mathbb E[X\mid Y]=\frac{\mathbb E[XY]}{\mathbb E[Y^2]}Y,$$ not always true ?
3 Answers
You are mixing up the notions of projection on the one-dimensional vector space spanned by $Y$ and projection on the space of all random variables measurable with respect to $\sigma (Y)$.
- 279,727
- 311,013
-
1Iknow it's false. But the question is why it doesn't work ? Maybe $\mathbb E[XY]$ is not really a scalar product ? – user621345 Dec 05 '18 at 09:41
-
@NewMath I have given an explanation now. – Kavi Rama Murthy Dec 05 '18 at 09:46
-
The second sentence of this post is the correct answer, everything else on this page, so far, is off the mark. (+1) – Did Dec 05 '18 at 10:00
-
1Ahhh... user Surb just added the argument to their answer. Cool. – Did Dec 05 '18 at 10:01
-
@Did: thank you for your comment :) – user621345 Dec 05 '18 at 15:27
I'm sure that in your book it's written that "$\mathbb E[X\mid Y]$ it the orthogonal projection onto $\sigma (Y)$" instead of "on $Y$". If $V$ is a finite vector, $W$ a subspace of $V$ and $\{w_1,...,w_n\}$ an orthogonal basis, then indeed $$Proj_W(v)=\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{\left<v,w_i\right>}{\|w_i\|^2}w_i.$$
This can be prolonged on $V$ and $W$ with infinite dimension with certain conditions (like Hilbert). Now, what would be an orthogonal basis of $L^2(\mathbb P,\sigma (Y))$ ?
- 55,662
Well if you take $X$ and $Y$ to be independent, the equation reads $$1 = \frac{Y\mathbb{E}(Y)}{\mathbb{E}(Y^2)},$$ which seems a little bit weird.
- 709