0

We can, although not in very formal way, prove the property $((x)^b)^a$=$(x)^{ba}$ this way:
$((x)^a)^b=(x)^a*(x)^a*…*(x)^a$ which is a product of $b$ number of $(x)^a$ terms.
$\space\space\space\space\space\space\space\space\space\space\space\space=(x*x*…*x)*(x*x*…*x)*…*(x*x*…*x)$ where $(x*x*…*x)$ is a product of $a$ number of x terms. We can now conclude that this expansion equals $(x)^{ba}$ since multiplication is associative. But this is proof for $a,b\in\mathbb{N}$. How would you prove this formula for $a,b\in\mathbb{R}$ if it can be proved?

2 Answers2

3

You have stumbled upon the reason why the rule $$ (x^a)^b = x^{ab} $$ either requires $x>0$, or it requires $a, b$ to be integers (specifying what is valid at $x = 0$ requires additional care, as then it's not fractional exponents that are problematic, but negative exponents). This is the resolution to your issue: when you say $((-2)^{2})^{1/2} = (-2)^1$, that expression simply doesn't fulfill the requirements we set on well-behaved exponential expressions, and thus it's not a valid equality.

On the other hand, $((-2)^2)^{1/2} = 4^{1/2} = 2$ is entiely valid, because that's how parentheses work.

As for how to prove $(x^a)^b = x^{ab}$ for general real $a, b$ and $x> 0$, that depends entirely on how you define $x^a$ in the first place. If you're using continuity, then it follows directly from a standard continuity argument. If you have defined $x^a$ as $e^{a\ln x}$, then it follows from standard logarithm manipulations.

Arthur
  • 199,419
0

brackets need evaluated first. BEDMAS, remember? in this light, $((-2)^2)^\frac{1}{2}=(4)^\frac{1}{2}=2$

therefore,$((-2)^2)^\frac{1}{2}\ne(-2)^{2\cdot\frac{1}{2}}$

WindSoul
  • 2,160