Interesting question. The answer is no: there are better approximations than $\frac{355}{113}$ (according to your metric), but they involve really big numbers.
As a number of commenters mentioned, continued fractions are the key to understanding this. The continued fraction of $\pi$ is
$$\pi = 3 + \cfrac{1}{7 + \cfrac{1}{15 + \cfrac{1}{1 + \cfrac{1}{292 + \ddots}}}}$$
(Sometimes the more compact notation $\pi = [3; 7, 15, 1, 292, \dots]$ is used.)
We can approximate $\pi$ by cutting off this infinite continued fraction at some point. These truncations of the continued fraction are called convergents. The first few for $\pi$ are $$3 = \cfrac{3}{1}, \quad 3 + \cfrac{1}{7} = \frac{22}{7}, \quad 3 + \cfrac{1}{7 + \cfrac{1}{15}} = \frac{333}{106}, \quad \text{and} \quad 3 + \cfrac{1}{7 + \cfrac{1}{15 + \cfrac{1}{1}}} = \frac{355}{113}.$$
An important fact about convergents of the continued fraction of a number $x$ is that they are best rational approximations of $x$. This means that if $\frac{p}{q}$ is a convergent of $x$, then $|x - \frac{p}{q}|$ is smaller than $|x - \frac{a}{b}|$ whenever $b \leq q$. Thus, $\frac{22}{7}$ is closer to $\pi$ than any fraction with denominator less than or equal to 7, $\frac{333}{106}$ is closer than any fraction with denominator less than or equal to 106, etc. (Confusingly, while every convergent is a best rational approximation, the converse is not true; not every best rational approximation is a convergent.)
So convergents provide pretty good approximations of a given denominator size. What's more, a given convergent will be especially close when the next term in the continued fraction is large. That's why $\frac{355}{113}$ is so close to $\pi$, because $\frac{355}{113} = [3; 7, 15, 1]$, and the next term in $\pi$'s continued fraction is 292, which is quite large.
In fact, suppose a given convergent is $\frac{p_n}{q_n}$. And suppose the next term in the continued fraction is $a_{n + 1}$. One can show, using Theorems 2 and 5 here, that we will have $\frac{1}{(a_{n + 1} + 2)q_n^2} < |x - \frac{p_n}{q_n}| < \frac{1}{a_{n + 1}q_n^2}$. For example, $\frac{1}{294\cdot 113^2} < |\pi - \frac{355}{113}| < \frac{1}{292\cdot 113^2}.$
For your problem, we're trying to find $a$ and $b$ to make $\log(ab) + \log(|\pi - \frac{a}{b}|)$ as small as possible. Observe that $a$ will be extremely close to $\pi b$, so essentially, we're trying to minimize $\log(\pi b^2) + \log(|\pi - \frac{a}{b}|) = \log(\pi b^2|\pi - \frac{a}{b}|)$. Since $\log$ is a monotone increasing function, this is the same as minimizing $\pi b^2|\pi - \frac{a}{b}|$, and of course we can drop the $\pi$ off there, so we want to make $b^2|\pi - \frac{a}{b}|$ as small as possible. For $\frac{355}{113}$, we know from above that $\frac{1}{294} < 113^2|\pi - \frac{355}{113}| < \frac{1}{292}$.
So the question becomes: can we find some term in $\pi$'s continued fraction that's larger than 292? We can, though we have to go pretty far in the sequence to find it. Here you can see that eventually 436 appears in the continued fraction of $\pi$. (Then not too long after that 20776 appears! But let's stick with 436.) For the convergent $\frac{p}{q}$ that comes just before that 436 term, we will have $\frac{1}{438} < q^2|\pi - \frac{p}{q}| < \frac{1}{436}$. So presumably this convergent will be smaller for your metric than $\frac{355}{113}$ is.
In fact, according to my calculations this convergent is given by $\frac{p}{q} = $
$\frac{47449023823422717451594836169381198840134089164995011450245185618387776847176840854174067173766596944222479515740143273879768480709913455315809719544718248}{15103493372765657274145753764324412346673615736564990480645229502691940095166708783466819743670409392336434093031760588386010342390699617474201564040715683}$
This differs from $\pi$ by about $1.003324411\cdot 10^{-311}$. Your metric is therefore equal to $\log(pq) + \log(|\pi - \frac{p}{q}|) = 308.855304691 - 310.998558621 = -2.143253930$ (assuming base-10 log; natural log would just be a multiple of this). By comparison, for $\frac{355}{113}$ your metric is $4.603306797 - 6.573872472 = -1.970565675$.
It's suspected, but not known, that the terms (a.k.a. partial quotients) in $\pi$'s continued fraction are unbounded. If that's true, then no approximation of $\pi$ will be optimal for your metric; rather, we will keep on finding approximations that make it lower and lower (with no lower bound).