I don't understand what the author means when he says that $F_1\cup F_2$ is an intersection of elements of $\mathcal{F}$. I would think it means that $F_1 \cup F_2 = \bigcap_{F\in \mathcal{F}} F$, but (b) says $\bigcap_{F\in \mathcal{F}} F=\emptyset$
Asked
Active
Viewed 155 times
0
-
See my answer here on how to solve 5E, and which also gives the right interpretation for (a). – Henno Brandsma Mar 18 '20 at 22:26
1 Answers
2
There is a big difference between
An intersection of elements in $\mathscr F$
and
The intersection of all elements in $\mathscr F$
We want there to be some subset $\mathscr E\subseteq \mathscr F$ so that $F_1\cup F_2 = \bigcap_{F\in\mathscr E}F$. However, many times, and in particular if $F_1$ and $F_2$ have points in common, $\mathscr E$ will not be all of $\mathscr F$
Arthur
- 199,419
-
did you mean generalized intersection? ie $F_1 \cup F_2 = \bigcap_{F\in\mathscr E}F $ – wessi Mar 18 '20 at 14:42
-
-
