2

Let $E$ be the splitting field of $f(x)=x^{4}-6x^{2}+7$ over $\mathbf{Q}$. Show that $\operatorname{Gal}(E/\mathbf{Q})$ is a non-abelian $2$-group.

Any help please. Thanks.

rae306
  • 9,742
Math1
  • 75

1 Answers1

4

Note that $f$ is irreducible since $f(X+1)$ is Eisenstein for $p=2$. The roots of $f$ are $\alpha_1=\sqrt{3+\sqrt{2}}$, $\alpha_2=\sqrt{3-\sqrt{2}}$, $\alpha_3=-\alpha_1$ and $\alpha_4=-\alpha_2$.

The splitting field of $f$ is $\Omega=\mathbf{Q}(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)$. Since $f$ is irreducible, $\alpha_1$ has degree $4$ over $\mathbf{Q}$. Note that $\alpha_1 \alpha_2=\sqrt{7}\not\in \mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{2})$, so $\mathbf{Q}(\alpha_1)\neq \mathbf{Q}(\alpha_2)$. But $\alpha_2$ is a zero of $X^2+\alpha_1^2-6\in \mathbf{Q}(\alpha_1)[X]$. This implies that $\Omega$ has degree $2^3$ over $\mathbf{Q}$. The Galois group is thus of order $2^3$. It remains to show that it is non-abelian..

Hint. If the Galois group were abelian, by the Galois correspondence every intermediate extension would be normal extension over $\mathbf{Q}$.

rae306
  • 9,742
  • 1
    Thank you..but can you explain more for me $\alpha_1 \alpha_2=\sqrt{7}\not\in \mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{2})$, so $\mathbf{Q}(\alpha_1)\neq \mathbf{Q}(\alpha_2)$ – Math1 May 01 '20 at 17:00
  • 2
    This is the following lemma in Galois theory on quadratic extensions. Let $K$ be an extension of $\mathbf{Q}$ and $K(\alpha),K(\beta)$ be two quadratic extensions of $K$. Then $K(\alpha)=K(\beta) \iff \alpha\beta\in K$. In this particular case we let $K=\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{2})$. The fields $\mathbf{Q}(\alpha_1)$ and $\mathbf{Q}(\alpha_2)$ are clearly quadratic over $K$ and so they are equal if and only if $\alpha_1\alpha_2=\sqrt{7}\in K$. – rae306 May 01 '20 at 17:04
  • Thank you very much! – Math1 May 01 '20 at 17:07
  • Did you also see that the answer to the hint is already included in the answer..? :-) – rae306 May 01 '20 at 17:11
  • "Since $f$ is irreducible, $\alpha_1$ has degree $4$ over $\mathbf{Q}$"..in this part I think – Math1 May 01 '20 at 17:15
  • 1
    Yes, exactly. $\mathbf{Q}(\alpha_1)/\mathbf{Q}$ is clearly not normal, since it does not contain its conjugate $\alpha_2$ by the argument above. – rae306 May 01 '20 at 17:19
  • @rae306 I don't think I understand the lemma from your comment. Does quadratic mean something other than "degree 2"? What about ]$K = \mathbb{Q}$, $\alpha = i$, and $\beta = 1+i$? Then $K(\alpha) = K(\beta)$ but $\alpha\beta \not\in K$. Is there a fix which still solves the original question? – CJD Sep 12 '20 at 13:13
  • 1
    @CJD I see I forgot to add the condition $\alpha^2,\beta^2\in K$. – rae306 Sep 12 '20 at 14:03