0

Theorem (Finite induction)

Let be P$(x)$ a property. So we suppose that

  1. P$(0)$,
  2. P$(n)\rightarrow$P$\big(S(n)\big)$, for all $n<k$

So P(n) is true for all $n<k$.

Unfortunately I can't formally prove the theorem. So could someone help me, please?

2 Answers2

2

Let $\pi:=\{h\in k:\mathbf{P}(h)\}$. So if it was $k\setminus \pi\neq\varnothing$ then there exist $m:=\min{k\setminus \pi}$ so we analise the case where $m=0$ and the case where $m\neq 0$. So for the hypothesis 1 it is impossible that $m=0$. Finally if $m\neq 0$ then $m=S(l)$ for some $l\in k$ and then $l\in\pi$ so that $\mathbf{P}(l)$ is true and so $\mathbf{P}(m)$ is true and this would be impossible.

2

Hint:

Consider the set $S=\lbrace n\in \bigl[\mkern-4mu\bigl|0,k\bigr|\mkern-4.25mu\bigr]\mid \ P(n)\text{ false }\rbrace$ and suppose $S\ne\varnothing$. As any nonempty subset of $\mathbf N$, it has a least element. Can you deduce a contradiction?

Bernard
  • 175,478
  • Let $\pi:={n\in\Bbb{N}:\mathbf{P}(n)}$. So if it was $n\setminus \pi\neq\varnothing$ then there exist $m:=\min{n\setminus \pi}$ and so if $l\in\Bbb{N}$ is such that $m=S(l)$ then $l\in\pi$ and so $\mathbf{P}(l)$ is true and so $\mathbf{P}(m)$ is true and this would be impossible. Do you what say this? – Antonio Maria Di Mauro Jun 24 '20 at 21:20
  • It's fine (I'd prefer a Π rather than a π). Τ To be quite complete, you have to mention that $m>0$. – Bernard Jun 24 '20 at 21:24
  • @AntonioMariaDiMauro: No, this doesn’t work: $\mathbf{P}(\ell)$ does not imply $\mathbf{P}(m)$ if $\ell\ge k$. Replace $\mathbf{P}(n)$ with the property $\mathbf{Q}(n)$ that is ‘$\mathbf{P}(n)$ or $k\le n$ and prove that $\mathbf{Q}(n)\to\mathbf{Q}(S(n))$ for all $n\in\Bbb N$. – Brian M. Scott Jun 24 '20 at 21:24
  • @BrianM.Scott Excuse me. I had do a terrible mistake: I wanted write $\pi:={n\in k:\mathbf{P}(n)}$. – Antonio Maria Di Mauro Jun 24 '20 at 21:27
  • Oh! yes. That's how I interpreted your way of writing. – Bernard Jun 24 '20 at 21:35