1

Let $f(x)=\sin\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)$ if $0<x\le1$ and $f(x)=0$ if $x=0$. Show that $f$ is Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$ and calculate it's integral on $[0,1]$.

I would like to know if my proof holds, please. And, I would like have a hint on how we can calculate the intergal of this such of functions, please.

My attempt is to pass by Darboux upper and lower sums.

To show that $f$ is Riemann integrable, we have to show the following:$\forall \epsilon>0$ $\exists$ a partition $\sigma$: $\overline{S}_{\sigma}(f)<\underline{S}_{\sigma}(f)+\epsilon$.

Let $0<\epsilon<2$ and consider the following intervals $[0,\epsilon/2]$ and $[\epsilon/2,1]$. First of all, as $f(x)$ is continuous on $[\epsilon/2,1]$($\sin(\frac{1}{x})$ is continuous on $[\epsilon/2,1]$), it is integrable on this interval. We would like to show now that $f$ is intergable on $[0,\epsilon/2]$. Consider the partition $\sigma=\{0,\frac{\epsilon}{2}\}$ on $[0,\epsilon/2]$ We have that

$\overline{S}_{\sigma}(f)-\underline{S}_{\sigma}(f)=\sum_{i=0}^{0}M_i(x_{i+1}-x_i)-\sum_{i=0}^{0}m_i(x_{i+1}-x_i)$ with $M_i=\sup\{f(x):x\in[x_i,x_{i+1}]\}$ and $m_i=\inf\{f(x):x\in[x_i,x_{i+1}]\}$.

We have that $M_i\le1$ and $m_i\le 0$. Thus,

$\sum_{i=0}^{0}M_i(x_{i+1}-x_i)-\sum_{i=0}^{0}m_i(x_{i+1}-x_i)\le1\cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2}< \epsilon$. Therefore, as $f(x)$ is integrable on $[0,\epsilon/2]$ and on $[\epsilon/2,1]$, we conclude that $f$ is integrable on $[0,1]$.

Now, I would like to calculate it's integral value... If someone could help with it, I would appreciate it. Honestly, I have no idea how to integrate this such of discontinuous functions at finitely many points.

Edit:

As $f(x)$ is continuous on $[\epsilon/3,1]$, it is integrable on this interval. Therefore, $\forall \epsilon>0 \ \exists$ partition $\tau$ on the interval $[\epsilon/3,1]$: $\overline{S}_{\tau}(f)-\underline{S}_{\tau}(f)<\epsilon/3$

To show that $f$ is integrable on $[0,1]$, we have to show that: $\forall \epsilon>0 \ \exists$ a partition $\sigma$: $\overline{S}_{\sigma}(f)-\underline{S}_{\sigma}<\epsilon$

Suppose $0<\epsilon<3$ and let $\sigma=\tau \ \cup \{0\}$ be a partition on the interval $[0,1]$. We have that (for the following inequality I use the same definition for $M_i$ and $m_i$ as above in the post):

$\overline{S}_{\sigma}(f)-\underline{S}_{\sigma}=\Big(\sum_{i=0}^{0}\underbrace{M_i}_{\le1}(x_{i+1}-x_i)-\sum_{i=0}^{0}\underbrace{m_i}_{\ge -1}(x_{i+1}-x_i)\Big)+\underbrace{\Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}M_i(x_{i+1}-x_i)-\sum_{i=1}^{n}m_i(x_{i+1}-x_i)\Big)}_{<\epsilon/3}<\frac{\epsilon}{3}+\frac{\epsilon}{3}+\frac{\epsilon}{3}=\epsilon$.

Therefore, $f$ is integrable on $[0,1]$.

Daniil
  • 1,647

2 Answers2

3

This is about feedback on your proof.

Your goal is to find a partition $\sigma$ such that $\overline{S}_{\sigma} (f) <\underline{S} _{\sigma} (f) +\epsilon $ but instead you are trying to use that $f$ is integrable on $[\epsilon/2,1]$ and prove that $f$ is integrable on $[0,\epsilon/2]$.

This is not what you want. You want a partition $\sigma$ which works as expected.

You can just say that since the function is integrable on $[\epsilon/2,1]$ there is a partition $\sigma_1$ of $[\epsilon/2,1]$ which works for this interval and then take $\sigma=\sigma_1\cup \{0\}$ and using your argument in question show that this particular partition works for $[0,1]$.

You have the correct idea but you need to present it in proper manner.

  • Alright, thank you for the feedback! I will try to finish the proof correctly. – Daniil Feb 27 '21 at 07:47
  • Thank you very much for your encouragement.... – Sebastiano Feb 27 '21 at 09:38
  • @Paramanand Singh I edited my answer. If you could take a look at it, I would really appreciate it x) Thank you very much for your help and answers! Edit: I think there is a problem in my inequality because of $m_i$ – Daniil Feb 27 '21 at 10:11
  • @Daniil: looks fine now (but I haven't done proof reading to check for typos). – Paramanand Singh Feb 27 '21 at 10:13
  • @Paramanand Singh Alright, thank you. But I think m inequality doesn't hold as if i suppose that $m_i\le 0$ it is not true my inequality. Probably, I should have used the interval with $\epsilon/3$ instead of $\epsilon/2$ and use the fact that $m_i\ge-1$ – Daniil Feb 27 '21 at 10:22
  • @Daniil: that seems unnecessary. You just need to think of sums like $\sum (M_i-m_i) (x_{i+1}-x_i)$ and then $M_i-m_i\geq 0$. No need to unnecessarily create more terms. – Paramanand Singh Feb 27 '21 at 10:27
0

Integrate by parts $$\int \sin \left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \, dx=x\sin \left(\frac{1}{x}\right) -\int x \left(-\frac{1}{x^2}\right)\cos \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\,dx=$$ $$=x \sin \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)-\text{Ci}\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)+C$$ Ci is cosine integral $$\text{Ci}(x)=-\int_x^{\infty}\frac{\cos x}{x}$$

$$\int_0^1 \sin \left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \, dx=\sin (1)-\text{Ci}(1)-\lim_{a\to 0^+}\left[a \sin \left(\frac{1}{a}\right)-\text{Ci}\left(\frac{1}{a}\right)\right]$$ set $\frac{1}{a}=t$ $$\lim_{t\to\infty}\left[\frac{1}{t} \sin t-\text{Ci}\left(t\right)\right]=0$$ $$\int_0^1 \sin \left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \, dx=\sin (1)-\text{Ci}(1)\approx 0.504$$

Raffaele
  • 26,371
  • Thank you for the answer! But, I still didn't see improper integrals. Does it matter in this case? – Daniil Feb 26 '21 at 17:28
  • Without knowing Cosine Integral function we can't solve the given integral. Or they wanted just an approximeted result? @Daniil – Raffaele Feb 26 '21 at 17:32
  • No, it was asked to calculate the value. But as it is not a homework (just problem found in the internet), I just would like to know if I'm capable to calculate this such of integrals. My level is Advanced Analysis I (so I didn't see improper integrals). But still I understand the idea of your calculation so thank you very much! But my main problem in the calculation was that I didn't know how to proceed as $ \sin(1/x)$ is undefined at $0$ but I think I see how you calculated it – Daniil Feb 26 '21 at 17:38
  • 1
    @Daniil I added a few lines to explain how to deal with this improper integral. Hope it is clear – Raffaele Feb 26 '21 at 17:49
  • It is more clear, thank you! What do you think about my proof on $f$ integrability, please? – Daniil Feb 26 '21 at 17:50