1

According to euler's formula \begin{equation} e^{i\pi}=-1 \tag{1} \label{1} \end{equation}

\begin{equation} e^{-i\pi}=-1 \tag{2} \end{equation}

Comparing $(1)$ and $(2)$, we get

$$ e^{i\pi}=e^{-i\pi} $$

Comparing the exponents on both sides, $$i\pi=-i\pi$$ Simplifying yields $$i=-i$$ Is this correct? If not, what is the mistake?

Sandejo
  • 1,366
  • 1
  • 8
  • 14
  • 1
    Please use MathJax when writing mathematics. You can follow this link for a resource on how to format your post: https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/mathjax-basic-tutorial-and-quick-reference – Jose Avilez Jun 14 '21 at 17:22
  • 1
    The complex exponential function is not one-to-one. You have just proved this! – GEdgar Jun 14 '21 at 17:25
  • Search tip: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/fake-proofs?tab=Frequent – Hans Lundmark Jun 14 '21 at 21:35

2 Answers2

3

Let's work with your reasoning. You have $$ e^{2\pi i} =1=e^0. $$ So $2\pi i =0$. Is this correct?

No, of course not. All you can say, if $e^{it}=e^{is}$, is that $s-t$ is an integer multiple of $2\pi i$. In your case, $i\pi=-i\pi +2\pi i$.

Martin Argerami
  • 205,756
1

You have a function $f$, for which $f(x_1)=f(x_2)\nRightarrow x_1=x_2$. Such a function is not injective. In your case $f(z)=e^z, z\in\mathbb C$. A simpler problem, which relies on the same principle is: Choose $f(x)=x^2, x\in\mathbb R$. Then $f(3)=3^2=9$ and $f(-3)=(-3)^2=9$. Does this mean that $3=-3$?

vitamin d
  • 5,783