0

We are familiar with the homotopy group of spheres $S^n$: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homotopy_groups_of_spheres. There we learn that $\pi_d(S^n)$ must be abelian and discrete. They are direct sum of $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\mathbb{Z}/p$ for some positive integer $p\geq 2$.

But there are general homotopy group of topological spaces $X$.

  • For $\pi_d(X)$, $d \geq 2$, am I correct to say that $\pi_d(X)$ must be an abelian group and a discrete finite group?

  • For the fundamental group $\pi_1(X)$:

  1. Is it possible that $\pi_1(X)$ can be non-abelian?
  2. Is it possible that $\pi_1(X)$ can be continuous, not just discrete?

For example, we can construct space like the wedge sum $S^1 \vee S^1 \vee S^m \vee S^n \vee \dots$?

1 Answers1

2

For any group $G$ there is actually a CW complex $X$ with $\pi_1(X)=G,$ so yes the fundamental group can be nonabelian. The construction is pretty simple and goes like this: Let $\langle \{g_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in I}\;|\;\{r_\beta\}_{\beta\in J}\rangle$ be a presentation for $G,$ where the $g_\alpha$ are generators and the $r_\beta$ are words in these generators which give the relations for $G.$ Then we let $X$ be the CW complex given by taking one circle for each generator $g_\alpha$ and wedging them all together. Then we attach 2-cells to this wedge of circles according to the relations. I think there's a theorem in Hatcher's book somewhere in Chapter 1 which proves that this gives the fundamental group you want.

For example, if $G=\mathbb Z\times\mathbb Z=\langle a,b\;|\;aba^{-1}b^{-1}\rangle$ then we start with a wedge of two circles, one corresponding to $a$ and the other to $b$ and we attach a disk by attaching one quarter of the boundary along $a,$ then the next quarter along $b,$ then the next quarter along $a$ but this time in reverse, and the final quarter along $b$ but again in reverse. After some thought and some drawings you should convince yourself that this is just a torus.

The trouble with your second question is that there is usually no topology on the fundamental group. Qi Zhu linked a nice discussion on MathOverflow discussing this in the comments. But if you just want a fundamental group isomorphic to $S^1$ or something as groups then the construction above will give you one.

D. Brogan
  • 3,427
  • 10
  • 20