As an alternative answer to this, let's use Dijkstra's generalization of the pigeonhole principle: for any set or bag (multiset), $\textit{average} \le \textit{maximum}$. (See EWD980, EWD1094; see also section 16.4 in Gries & Schneider, "A Logical Approach to Discrete math".)
For the pigeonhole principle, the key choices are: what are the pigeons, and what are the holes? For Dijkstra's generalization, the key choice is: what is the bag?
In this case we need to prove that there is a "3-sum" (i.e., the sum of the numbers assigned to 3 consecutive vertices) that is at least 14, or in other words, that the maximum 3-sum is at least 14.
Proof. The above suggests to look at the bag of all 3-sums, and investigate its average.
To calculate the average we need to know the sum of all 3-sums and the number of 3-sums. Since each vertex occurs in exactly 3 3-sums, the sum of all 3-sums is 3 times the sum of all vertex numbers, or $3 \times (0 + 1 + \dots + 9)$, or 135. The number of 3-sums is obviously 10. Therefore the average 3-sum is 135/10 or 13.5.
Now by the generalized principle ($\textit{average} \le \textit{maximum}$) it follows that the maximum 3-sum is at least 13.5. And since all 3-sums are integers (since each vertex number is an integer) we can round up, and the maximum 3-sum is at least 14.
Therefore we have proven that there is a 3-sum that is at least 14.
For 2) $x_0+x_1+..x_9=45$ as i added values $0+1..+9=45$ , so $S_0+S_1..S_9$ is in between $45$ and $130$.
– Kj Tada Jul 05 '13 at 09:41