Let's say A=empty set and every element of A also a set, what is the intersection of all elements of A?
real answer:?
possible answer: universal set (I found it via using Russel paradox. And then I thought backward.)
Let's say A=empty set and every element of A also a set, what is the intersection of all elements of A?
real answer:?
possible answer: universal set (I found it via using Russel paradox. And then I thought backward.)
Every element of the empty set is a set, no need to assume that. But the intersection of the elements of the empty set is undefined; the definition of intersections applies only to non-empty families of sets.
(Why is it undefined? If we try to apply the definition, with $I$ being the intersection of the elements of the empty set, we get $$x\in I\iff\forall y\in \emptyset\,\,\,\, x\in y.$$But that says that every $x$ is in $I$, and there is no "universal set" in modern set theory)
Proof of $\forall i, X_i\subseteq X$, then $\bigcap_{i\in\emptyset}X_i=X$ is like this. However, to avoid Russell's paradox, it must first be implicitly assumed that all actions take place under a particular set(in this case, $X$).
For all $x\in X$, $i\in\emptyset \Rightarrow\bigcap_{i\in\emptyset} x\in X_i$ holds, because it is vacuous truth, since antecedent $i\in\emptyset$ is false.