3

Let a sequence $\{a_n\}_{n=1}^\infty$ satisfy $0<a_1<1$ and $a_{n+1}=a_n(1-a_n)$ for $n\geq 1$. Prove that $\{\log n-n(1-na_n)\}$ is convergent (without using asymptotic analysis).

This problem came to me when I was preparing my exercise lessons on Analysis(I) course, as a teaching assistant. The original problem asks students to prove $\lim_{n\to\infty}na_n=1$. I'm curious about the asymptotic behaviour of this sequence. Using the method of asymptotic analysis, I found that $$a_n= \frac1n-\frac{\log n}{n^2}+\frac C{n^2}+o\left(\frac1{n^2}\right),\qquad n\to\infty,$$ where $C$ is a constant probably depending on the value of $a_1$. After that, I tried to prove this asymptotic relation, by directly proving the following three properties:

  • $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}na_n=1$.
  • $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{n}{\log n}(1-na_n)=1$.
  • $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}\log n\left(1-\frac{n}{\log n}(1-na_n)\right)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\log n-n(1-na_n)\right)$ exists.

We can easily show that $a_n$ is decreasing to $0$. The first two properties can be proved using $\frac1{a_{n+1}}=\frac1{a_n}+\frac1{1-a_n}$ and Stolz–Cesàro theorem: for the first one, we apply Stolz–Cesàro theorem to $\frac{n}{1/a_n}$; and for the second one, we apply Stolz–Cesàro theorem to $$\frac{\frac{1-na_n}{a_n}}{\log n}=\frac{\frac1{a_n}-n}{\log n}.$$

However, I don't know how to prove the third one. I don't believe that we can prove it by directly using Stolz–Cesàro theorem. Because Stolz–Cesàro theorem will give a limit not depending on $a_1$.

Any help would be appreciated!

Feng
  • 13,705
  • Why do you think the limit should depend on $a_1$? For instance $a_{n+1} = \cos a_n$ converges to the same number, regardless of the choice of $a_1$. – PierreCarre Sep 21 '22 at 09:57
  • @PierreCarre See this linked answer, where the author also uses the method of asymptotic analysis to find the asymptotic behavoir. He also did some numerical simulations, which suggested that the limit of $\log n-n(1-na_n)$ may depend on $a_1$. – Feng Sep 21 '22 at 10:22

1 Answers1

3

I don't get what "without asymptotic analysis" means.

So let's redo the solution (using Stolz–Cesàro theorem). Given $a_{n+1}=a_n(1-a_n)$ with $0<a_1<1$, we get $a_n\to 0$ as $n\to\infty$ easily. Next, we put $a_n=1/b_n$; then $b_n\to\infty$ and $$b_{n+1}-b_n=1+\frac1{b_n-1}\to1,$$ thus $b_n/n\to1$ by SCT. Now we put $b_n=n+c_n$; then $c_n=o(n)$ and $$c_{n+1}-c_n=\frac1{n+c_n-1}\implies\frac{c_{n+1}-c_n}{\log(n+1)-\log n}\to1,$$ and SCT gives $c_n/\log n\to1$. Finally put $c_n=\log n+d_n$; then $d_n=o(\log n)$ and $$d_{n+1}-d_n=\frac1{n+\log n+d_n-1}-\log\left(1+\frac1n\right)=O\left(\frac{\log n}{n^2}\right),$$ thus $\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty(d_{n+1}-d_n)$ converges (absolutely) and $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}d_n=d_\infty$ exists.

Plugging everything back, we have $a_n=1/(n+\log n+d_n)$, and $$\log n-n(1-na_n)=-d_n+\frac{(\log n+d_n)^2}{n+\log n+d_n}$$ tends to $-d_\infty$ as $n\to\infty$.

metamorphy
  • 39,111