0

I am trying to determine the minimal polynomial of $\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}}$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ and explain why does it have degree $4$.

I found that the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^4-2x^2-1$. It is monic, and $f(\alpha)=0$. It is also irreducible as the only possible roots are $\pm 1$, however, $f(\pm 1)\ne 0$. Now, I am trying to explain why does it have degree $4$, and here is what I got:

  • The degree is not $1$ as $\alpha \notin \mathbb{Q}$.

  • The degree is not $2$ as if it was then $\alpha ^2+b \alpha +c=0$ for some $b,c \in \mathbb{Q}$. Then

$1+\sqrt{2}+(\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}})b+c=0\implies \sqrt{2} (b^2+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}} b)=c^2+2c-b^2-1$.

The right hand side is in $\mathbb{Q}$, but the left isn’t, which is a contradiction.

I am stuck at showing that the degree is not $3$ though. If it was three then I think that $[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}]=3$, and this should lead us at a contraction. I am not sure how to show that.

Dima
  • 2,479
  • Is $\sqrt{\sqrt 2+1}$ really the root of $x^4-2x-1$? – Тyma Gaidash Nov 08 '22 at 18:11
  • 2
    @TymaGaidash Looks like a typo. It should be $x^4-2x^2-1$. – Christian E. Ramirez Nov 08 '22 at 18:13
  • 2
    @TymaGaidash sorry I meant $x^4-2x^2-1$ – Dima Nov 08 '22 at 18:15
  • 3
    "It is also irreducible as the only possible roots are $\pm 1$" - that only rules out linear factors, you need to rule out quadratic factors too (or notice $f(x+1)$ satisfies conditions of Eisenstein criterion). – Sil Nov 08 '22 at 18:17
  • 1
    By far the simplest way to do this: Apply Eisenstein's criterion to $f(x+1)=x^4+4x^3+4x^2-2$. – Christian E. Ramirez Nov 08 '22 at 18:18
  • How do you know the left side isn't in $\mathbb Q$? – mr_e_man Nov 08 '22 at 18:21
  • @mr_e_man I think it would be in $\mathbb{Q}$ only if $b=0$, but if $b=0$, then $0=\alpha^2+b\alpha+c=\alpha^2+c$, and thus $c=-(1+\sqrt{2})$, but $c\in \mathbb{Q}$. Is that right? – Dima Nov 08 '22 at 18:48
  • For comparison, consider $$\sqrt2\big((1)^2+\sqrt{3-2\sqrt2};(1)\big)=2$$ which is in $\mathbb Q$. – mr_e_man Nov 08 '22 at 18:59
  • You need to prove that $\sqrt{1+\sqrt2}$ is not in $\mathbb Q(\sqrt2)$. – mr_e_man Nov 08 '22 at 19:00
  • So, suppose $(x+y\sqrt2)^2=1+\sqrt2$ for some rational $x,y$. That means $$x^2+2y^2=1,\quad2xy=1.$$ Can you show that this is impossible? – mr_e_man Nov 08 '22 at 19:12
  • @mr_e_man I was about to write this :), I tried solving this system but it only has complex solutions. So $\alpha \notin \mathbb{Q} (\sqrt{2})$. – Dima Nov 08 '22 at 19:17
  • 1
    You have already proved that the polynomial has no linear factor (and hence no cubic factor as well). You can also observe that if $a$ is a root of polynomial then $-a$ is also a root and hence if it has a quadratic factor then we must have the polynomial expressed as $(x^2+px+q)(x^2-px+q)$. Derive an obvious contradiction now. – Paramanand Singh Nov 09 '22 at 02:07
  • how do you conclude that $f$ is not reducible? why 1 and -1 ? – NotaChoice Nov 10 '22 at 17:26
  • 1
    @NotaChoice see proposition 9.4.11 in Dummit and Foote, if you don’t have the book, please let me know so that I write the proposition for you. – Dima Nov 11 '22 at 02:30

3 Answers3

3

You have $\mathbb{Q} \hookrightarrow \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}) \hookrightarrow\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}})$ : since $[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}) : \mathbb{Q}]=2$, then $[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}}) : \mathbb{Q}]$ is dividible by $2$, so the minimal polynomial of $\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}}$ cannot have degree $3$.

TheSilverDoe
  • 29,720
1

If $[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}]=3$, then $\alpha$ would be the zero of a polynomial $p$ of degree $3$. $p$ would divide $f$. A contradiction as you proved that $f$ is irreducible over $\mathbb Q$.

0

This is not an answer but I always wanted to understand something :

Let $\alpha= \sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}}$ , the only way to get rid of the square root is to square ; $\alpha^2= 1+\sqrt{2}\ \ $ then $\sqrt{2}= \alpha^2 -1$ so, again squaring ; $2= (\alpha^2 -1)^2= \alpha^4- 2\alpha^2+ 1$ , meaning that $\alpha$ is a root of $$x^4-2x^2-1$$ Now here is the argument that I want you to confirm whether it is valid or not : Since we arrived to that polynomial just by 'getting rid of the square roots' in a 'minimal' way, i.e. this is the polynomial with the smallest degree we can have if we try to find a polynomial with rational coefficients. ( why? because we were just getting rid of the radicals ), and this polynomial is irreducible, then $[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}]= 4$ .

It seems that this argument is not quite valid because of cubics, or polynomials of degree $3$. I wonder if there is a way, a constructive way, for any root of a cubic to find immediately that polynomial, so that to make this argument valid every time?

I mean starting with $\alpha$ , and just getting rid of the radicals to arrive to the minimal polynomial, which will be of degree $3$, $4$, $5$, $6$, or more ...

NotaChoice
  • 931
  • 3
  • 15
  • This should possibly have been a new question, but I try and explain it anyway. The trouble is that something like the following may happen. Do the same with $\beta=\sqrt{3+2\sqrt2}$. You get $\beta^2=3+2\sqrt2$ and then $$0=(\beta^2-3)^2-8=\beta^4-6\beta^2+1.$$ But $$x^4-6x^2+1=(x^4-2x^2+1)-4x^2=(x^2-1)^2-(2x)^2$$ is the difference of two squares and hence factors as $(x^2-2x-1)(x^2+2x-1)$.

    I was mean and set this up. The explanation is that $$(1+\sqrt2)^2=3+2\sqrt2,$$ so we really had $\beta=\alpha^2$. Or, phrased differently, it was possible to denest the square root.

    – Jyrki Lahtonen Nov 10 '22 at 18:39
  • 1
  • Be prepared for this to get deleted. You really shouldn't post follow up questions as answers. – Jyrki Lahtonen Nov 10 '22 at 18:56
  • still the polynomial $x^4-2x^2-1$ is irreducible, only then I can make the conclusion. The question is how I can guarantee that there is no cubic. – NotaChoice Nov 11 '22 at 03:00
  • I am confused actually. The original question asks to explain why the minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ has degree $4$ : the person asking found that $\alpha$ is a root of $p(x)$ and that $p(x)$ is irreducible and has degree $4$. Isn't this enough as a justification? What does he want to explain exactly? – NotaChoice Nov 11 '22 at 03:30
  • And my question is another idea actually I will probably post it later – NotaChoice Nov 11 '22 at 03:32
  • Sorry, I mistook you for the OP. Yeah, you really should ask another question. The OP's argument excluding quadratic polynomials is not entirely convincing. And the cubic factors were eliminated by eliminating linear factors. – Jyrki Lahtonen Nov 11 '22 at 03:38