since OP mentions an interest in recurrence relations, it may be a worthwhile exercise to supplement Marko's excellent answer with the following naive combinatorial argument.
let us define $\psi(n)$ to be the number of ones occurring in all partitions of $n$. we also define $P^n$ as the number of partitions of $n$ and $P_m^n$ as the number of partitions of $n$ containing exactly $m$ ones. clearly we must have
$$ \psi(n) = \sum_{k=0}^n k\;P_k^n$$
and also, for $0 \le m \le k$
$$P_k^n = P_{k-m}^{n-m}
$$
giving
$$ \psi(n) = \sum_{k=1}^n k\;P_k^n \\
= \sum_{k=1}^n \sum_{m=1}^k P_k^n \\
= \sum_{m=1}^n \sum_{k=m}^n P_k^n \\
= \sum_{m=1}^n \sum_{k=0}^{n-m} P_k^{n-m} \\
$$
as the sum of partitions containing all possible numbers of ones we have:
$$\sum_{k=0}^{n-m} P_k^{n-m} = P^{n-m}$$
thus
$$ \psi(n) = \sum_{m=1}^n P^{n-m}
\\ = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} P^k $$
which agrees with the result Marko obtained using generating functions